Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511208›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The influence of caging, bedding, and diet on the composition of the microbiota in different regions of the mouse gut.

Aaron C Ericsson, Jonalyn Gagliardi, Delia Bouhan, William G Spollen, Scott A Givan, Craig L Franklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. LipReg4 deletion blocks hypertension induced by gut S. aureofaciens Tü117.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Maintaining Welfare While Extending Cage-Change Intervals: A Performance-Based Study in IVC-Housed Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Long Term Culture of Germ-Free Zebrafish Using Gamma-Irradiated Feeds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Role of gut microbiota and its functional products in prenatal alcohol-induced anxiety-like behavior.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron C EricssonUniversity of Missouri Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, Columbia, USA.
Jonalyn GagliardiUniversity of Missouri, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Columbia, USA.
Delia BouhanUniversity of Missouri Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, Columbia, USA.
William G SpollenUniversity of Missouri, Informatics Research Core Facility, Columbia, USA.
Scott A GivanUniversity of Missouri, Informatics Research Core Facility, Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0630-8589
Craig L FranklinUniversity of Missouri Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, Columbia, USA. franklinc@missouri.edu.

Funding

The Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center at the University of Missouri - ResourceU42OD010918 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI Bret Daniel Ulery · 2012 to 2026
$25.1M
Impact of gut microbiota and segmented filamentous bacteria on colitis-associated colorectal cancerK01OD019924 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ERICSSON, AARON · 2016 to 2020
$573k
NIH HHS K01 OD019924NIH HHS U42 OD010918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Countless studies have identified differences between the gut microbiota of humans affected with myriad conditions and healthy individuals, and animal models are commonly used to determine whether those differences are causative or correlative. Recently, concerns have arisen regarding the reproducibility of animal models between institutions and across time. To determine the influence of three common husbandry-associated factors that vary between institutions, groups of weanling mice were placed in either static or ventilated microisolator caging, with either aspen or paperchip bedding, and with one of three commonly used rodent chows, in a fully crossed study design. After thirteen weeks, samples were collected from multiple regions of the gastrointestinal tract and characterized using culture-independent sequencing methods. Results demonstrated that seemingly benign husbandry factors can interact to induce profound changes in the composition of the microbiota present in certain regions of the gut, most notably the cecum, and that those changes are muted during colonic transit. These findings indicate that differences in factors such as caging and bedding can interact to modulate the gut microbiota that in turn may affect reproducibility of some animal models, and that cecal samples might be optimal when screening environmental effects on the gut microbiota.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal HusbandryAnimalsDietGastrointestinal TractMetagenomicsMiceModels, AnimalReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29511208
PMCPMC5840362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.