Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511099›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Noninvasive detection of macrophage activation with single-cell resolution through machine learning.

Nicolas Pavillon, Alison J Hobro, Shizuo Akira, Nicholas I Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cell-Based Immuno-Biosensors Using Microfluidics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Noninvasive andThe Analyst · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. mJournal of dental research · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicolas PavillonBiophotonics Laboratory, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan; n-pavillon@ifrec.osaka-u.ac.jp nsmith@ap.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Alison J HobroBiophotonics Laboratory, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan.
Shizuo AkiraHost Defense, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan.
Nicholas I SmithBiophotonics Laboratory, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan; n-pavillon@ifrec.osaka-u.ac.jp nsmith@ap.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a method enabling the noninvasive study of minute cellular changes in response to stimuli, based on the acquisition of multiple parameters through label-free microscopy. The retrieved parameters are related to different attributes of the cell. Morphological variables are extracted from quantitative phase microscopy and autofluorescence images, while molecular indicators are retrieved via Raman spectroscopy. We show that these independent parameters can be used to build a multivariate statistical model based on logistic regression, which we apply to the detection at the single-cell level of macrophage activation induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure and compare their respective performance in assessing the individual cellular state. The models generated from either morphology or Raman can reliably and independently detect the activation state of macrophage cells, which is validated by comparison with their cytokine secretion and intracellular expression of molecules related to the immune response. The independent models agree on the degree of activation, showing that the features provide insight into the cellular response heterogeneity. We found that morphological indicators are linked to the phenotype, which is mostly related to downstream effects, making the results obtained with these variables dose-dependent. On the other hand, Raman indicators are representative of upstream intracellular molecular changes related to specific activation pathways. By partially inhibiting the LPS-induced activation using progesterone, we could identify several subpopulations, showing the ability of our approach to identify the effect of LPS activation, specific inhibition of LPS, and also the effect of progesterone alone on macrophage cells.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLipopolysaccharidesMacrophage ActivationMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalProgesteroneRAW 264.7 CellsSingle-Cell AnalysisSpectrum Analysis, RamanLipopolysaccharidesProgesteronecellular heterogeneityimmune responselabel-free imaginglive single cellmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID29511099
PMCPMC5866539
OpenAlexW2790631129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.