Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511006›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

Effects of five types of selenium supplementation for treatment of Kashin-Beck disease in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Dongmei Xie, Yulin Liao, Jirong Yue, Chao Zhang, Yanyan Wang, Chuanyao Deng, Ling Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biological and Catalytic Properties of Selenoproteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Biological Activity of Selenium and Its Impact on Human Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Environmental Selenium and Human Health: an Update.Current environmental health reports · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dongmei XieNational Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
Yulin LiaoDepartment of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jirong YueNational Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
Chao ZhangCenter for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Yanyan WangDepartment of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chuanyao DengDepartment of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ling ChenDepartment of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNTaihe Hospital · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of five kinds of selenium supplementation for the treatment of patients with Kashin-Beck disease, and rank these selenium supplementations based on their performance.

designWe searched for all publications between 1 January 1966 and 31 March 2017 using seven electronic databases. GRADE system to network meta-analyses (NMAs) was applied to rate the quality of the evidence. We conducted a random effects model NMA in STATA 12.1 to determine comparative effectiveness of each intervention. Rankings were obtained by using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values and mean ranks.

resultsA total of 15 randomised controlled trials involving 2931 patients were included. After assessment of the overall quality of the evidence, we downgraded our primary outcomes from high to low or very low quality. NMAs showed that all five kinds of selenium supplementation had higher metaphysis X-ray improvement which were superior to placebo. Ranking on efficacy indicated that selenium salt was ranked the highest, followed by sodium selenite + vitamin E, selenium enriched yeast, sodium selenite and then sodium selenite + vitamin C.

conclusionsBased on the results of NMA, all five types of selenium supplements are more effective than placebo and so that selenium supplementation is of help in repairing metaphyseal lesions. Since the overall quality of the evidence was low or very low, the SUCRA values may be misleading and should be considered jointly with the The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) confidence in the estimates for each comparison. The quality of the evidence is insufficient to draw a conclusion about what method of selenium supplementation is most effective. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016051874.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdolescentBone and BonesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansKashin-Beck DiseaseMaleRadiographySeleniumSelenium CompoundsSeleniumSelenium Compoundskashin-beck diseasenetwork meta-analysisrandomized controlled trialselenium supplementation

Identifiers

PMID29511006
PMCPMC5855457
OpenAlexW2793122576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.