Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29510843›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2018

Lessons Learned Recruiting Minority Participants for Research in Urban Community Health Centers.

Elizabeth Fam, Jeanne M Ferrante

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Building research capacity at FQHCs: A model of support from theJournal of clinical and translational science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth FamPreliminary Medicine, Rutgers- New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Ave, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Jeanne M FerranteDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 112 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA; The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Rutgers Institute of Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. Electronic address: jeanne.ferrante@rutgers.edu.
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyRutgers New Jersey Medical School

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities by Decreasing Weight Bias in Community Healthcare SetR21CA165939 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI FERRANTE, JEANNE M · 2013 to 2014
$375k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA165939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To help understand and mitigate health disparities, it is important to conduct research with underserved and underrepresented minority populations under real world settings. There is a gap in the literature detailing real-time research staff experience, particularly in their own words, while conducting in-person patient recruitment in urban community health centers. This paper describes challenges faced at the clinic, staff, and patient levels, our lessons learned, and strategies implemented by research staff while recruiting predominantly low-income African-American women for an interviewer-administered survey study in four urban Federally Qualified Health Centers in New Jersey. Using a series of immersion-crystallization cycles, fieldnotes and research reflections written by recruiters, along with notes from team meetings during the study, were qualitatively analyzed. Clinic level barriers included: physical layout of clinic, very low or high patient census, limited private space, and long wait times for patients. Staff level barriers included: unengaged staff, overburdened staff, and provider and staff turnover. Patient level barriers included: disinterested patients, patient mistrust and concerns over confidentiality, no-shows or lack of patient time, and language barrier. We describe strategies used to overcome these barriers and provide recommendations for in-person recruitment of underserved populations into research studies. To help mitigate health disparities, disseminating recruiters' experiences, challenges, and effective strategies used will allow other researchers to build upon these experience in order to increase recruitment success of underserved and underrepresented minority populations into research studies.

Indexed as

Minority GroupsAdultBiomedical ResearchCommunity Health CentersFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew JerseyPatient SelectionPilot ProjectsPovertySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesHealth disparitiesMinoritiesRecruitmentUnderserved populations

Identifiers

PMID29510843
PMCPMC5844362
OpenAlexW2734648569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.