Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29510747›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2018

The left frontal cortex supports reserve in aging by enhancing functional network efficiency.

Nicolai Franzmeier, Julia Hartmann, Alexander N W Taylor, Miguel Á Araque-Caballero, Lee Simon-Vermot, Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Katharina Bürger, Cihan Catak, Daniel Janowitz, Claudia Müller and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Integrating Network Pharmacology, Quantitative Metabolic Network Analysis,Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effect of Aging on Face-Name Recognition: An fMRI Study.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nicolai FranzmeierInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Julia HartmannInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Alexander N W TaylorSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Miguel Á Araque-CaballeroInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Lee Simon-VermotInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Lana Kambeitz-IlankovicDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Nussbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Katharina BürgerInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Cihan CatakInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Daniel JanowitzInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Claudia MüllerInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Birgit Ertl-WagnerInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Robert StahlInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Martin DichgansInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Marco DueringInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Michael EwersInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany. michael.ewers@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5231-1714

Funding

Alzheimer Forschung Initiative DE-15-035European Commission PCIG12-GA-2012-334259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent evidence derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies suggests that functional hubs (i.e., highly connected brain regions) are important for mental health. We found recently that global connectivity of a hub in the left frontal cortex (LFC connectivity) is associated with relatively preserved memory abilities and higher levels of protective factors (education, IQ) in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. These results suggest that LFC connectivity supports reserve capacity, alleviating memory decline. An open question, however, is why LFC connectivity is beneficial and supports memory function in the face of neurodegeneration. We hypothesized that higher LFC connectivity is associated with enhanced efficiency in connected major networks involved in episodic memory. We further hypothesized that higher LFC-related network efficiency predicts higher memory abilities.

methodsWe assessed fMRI during a face-name association learning task performed by 26 healthy, cognitively normal elderly participants. Using beta-series correlation analysis, we computed task-related LFC connectivity to key memory networks, including the default mode network (DMN) and dorsal attention network (DAN). Network efficiency within the DMN and DAN was estimated by the graph theoretical small-worldness statistic. We applied linear regression analyses to test the association between LFC connectivity with the DMN/DAN and small-worldness of these networks. Mediation analysis was applied to test LFC connectivity to the DMN and DAN as a mediator of the association between education and higher DMN and DAN small-worldness. Last, we tested network small-worldness as a predictor of memory performance.

resultsWe found that higher LFC connectivity to the DMN and DAN during successful memory encoding and recognition was associated with higher small-worldness of those networks. Higher task-related LFC connectivity mediated the association between education and higher small-worldness in the DMN and DAN. Further, higher small-worldness of these networks predicted better performance in the memory task.

conclusionsThe present results suggest that higher education-related LFC connectivity to key memory networks during a memory task is associated with higher network efficiency and thus enhanced reserve of memory abilities in aging.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAssociation LearningAttentionFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysOxygenAgingCognitive reserveFrontoparietal control networkMemory task fMRISmall-worldness

Identifiers

PMID29510747
PMCPMC5838935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.