Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29510715›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work): using the behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention to reduce sitting time in the workplace.

Fehmidah Munir, Stuart J H Biddle, Melanie J Davies, David Dunstan, David Esliger, Laura J Gray, Ben R Jackson, Sophie E O'Connell, Tom Yates, Charlotte L Edwardson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. An Exploration of Adults Transitioning Into Retirements' Perspectives on Vigorous Intermittent Lifestyle Physical Activity.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fehmidah MunirSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK. f.munir@lboro.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-0243
Stuart J H BiddleSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
Melanie J DaviesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
David DunstanSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David EsligerSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
Laura J GrayDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Ben R JacksonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
Sophie E O'ConnellLeicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Tom YatesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Charlotte L EdwardsonDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research PR-R5-0213-25004)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSitting (sedentary behaviour) is widespread among desk-based office workers and a high level of sedentary behaviour is a risk factor for poor health. Reducing workplace sitting time is therefore an important prevention strategy. Interventions are more likely to be effective if they are theory and evidence-based. The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) provides a framework for intervention development. This article describes the development of the Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work) intervention, which aims to reduce sitting time among National Health Service (NHS) office-based workers in Leicester, UK.

methodsWe followed the BCW guide and used the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Behaviour (COM-B) model to conduct focus group discussions with 39 NHS office workers. With these data we used the taxonomy of Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTv1) to identify the most appropriate strategies for facilitating behaviour change in our intervention. To identify the best method for participants to self-monitor their sitting time, a sub-group of participants (n = 31) tested a number of electronic self-monitoring devices.

resultsFrom our BCW steps and the BCT-Taxonomy we identified 10 behaviour change strategies addressing environmental (e.g. provision of height adjustable desks,), organisational (e.g. senior management support, seminar), and individual level (e.g. face-to-face coaching session) barriers. The Darma cushion scored the highest for practicality and acceptability for self-monitoring sitting.

conclusionThe BCW guide, COM-B model and BCT-Taxonomy can be applied successfully in the context of designing a workplace intervention for reducing sitting time through standing and moving more. The intervention was developed in collaboration with office workers (a participatory approach) to ensure relevance for them and their work situation. The effectiveness of this intervention is currently being evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.

trial registrationISRCTN10967042 . Registered on 2 February 2015.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorOccupational HealthPostureWorkplaceAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsRisk FactorsSedentary BehaviorTime FactorsBehaviour changeCOM-B frameworkInterventionSedentary behaviourSit-stand deskWorkplace sitting

Identifiers

PMID29510715
PMCPMC5840779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.