Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29510687›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2018

Bacterial risk factors for treatment failure and relapse among patients with isoniazid resistant tuberculosis.

Phan Vuong Khac Thai, Dang Thi Minh Ha, Nguyen Thi Hanh, Jeremy Day, Sarah Dunstan, Nguyen Thi Quynh Nhu, Vo Sy Kiet, Nguyen Huu Lan, Nguyen Huy Dung, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Phan Vuong Khac ThaiPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Dang Thi Minh HaPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi HanhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 763 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jeremy DayOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 763 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Sarah DunstanOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 763 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Quynh NhuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 763 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vo Sy KietOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 763 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Huu LanPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Huy DungPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Ngoc LanPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thuong ThuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 763 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Ngoc LanPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Phạm Thị Thúy LiễuPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyễn Thị HồngPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Đào Công ĐiệpPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyễn Thị Kim ThanhPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyễn Văn HộiPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyễn Văn NghĩaPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Trương Ngọc ĐạiPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoàng Quang MinhPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyễn Văn ThơmPham Ngoc Thach Hospital, 120 Hung Vuong, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jeremy FarrarOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 763 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Maxine CawsOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 763 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. mcaws@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9109-350X
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNNepal Medical College Teaching Hospital · NPThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust 081814/Z/06/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug resistant tuberculosis (TB) is increasing in prevalence worldwide. Treatment failure and relapse is known to be high for patients with isoniazid resistant TB treated with standard first line regimens. However, risk factors for unfavourable outcomes and the optimal treatment regimen for isoniazid resistant TB are unknown. This cohort study was conducted when Vietnam used the eight month first line treatment regimen and examined risk factors for failure/relapse among patients with isoniazid resistant TB.

methodsBetween December 2008 and June 2011 2090 consecutive HIV-negative adults (≥18 years of age) with new smear positive pulmonary TB presenting at participating district TB units in Ho Chi Minh City were recruited. Participants with isoniazid resistant TB identified by Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility (MODS) had extended follow-up for 2 years with mycobacterial culture to test for relapse. MGIT drug susceptibility testing confirmed 239 participants with isoniazid resistant, rifampicin susceptible TB. Bacterial and demographic factors were analysed for association with treatment failure and relapse.

resultsUsing only routine programmatic sputum smear microscopy for assessment, (months 2, 5 and 8) 30/239 (12.6%) had an unfavourable outcome by WHO criteria. Thirty-nine patients were additionally detected with unfavourable outcomes during 2 year follow up, giving a total of 69/239 (28.9%) of isoniazid (INH) resistant cases with unfavourable outcome by 2 years of follow-up. Beijing lineage was the only factor significantly associated with unfavourable outcome among INH-resistant TB cases during 2 years of follow-up. (adjusted OR = 3.16 [1.54-6.47], P = 0.002).

conclusionOne third of isoniazid resistant TB cases suffered failure/relapse within 2 years under the old eight month regimen. Over half of these cases were not identified by standard WHO recommended treatment monitoring. Intensified research on early identification and optimal regimens for isoniazid resistant TB is needed. Infection with Beijing genotype of TB is a significant risk factor for bacterial persistence on treatment resulting in failure/relapse within 2 years. The underlying mechanism of increased tolerance for standard drug regimens in Beijing genotype strains remains unknown.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntitubercular AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIsoniazidMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisRecurrenceRifampinRisk FactorsSputumTreatment FailureTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidRifampinIsoniazidMultidrug resistanceResistanceTreatmentTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID29510687
PMCPMC5840777
OpenAlexW2796977577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.