Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29510684›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Community perception regarding childhood vaccinations and its implications for effectiveness: a qualitative study in rural Burkina Faso.

M Kagoné, M Yé, E Nébié, A Sié, O Müller, C Beiersmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M KagonéCentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Ministry of Health, PO Box 02, Nouna, Burkina Faso. kmoubache@yahoo.fr.
M YéCentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Ministry of Health, PO Box 02, Nouna, Burkina Faso.
E NébiéCentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Ministry of Health, PO Box 02, Nouna, Burkina Faso.
A SiéCentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Ministry of Health, PO Box 02, Nouna, Burkina Faso.
O MüllerInstitute of Public Health, Medical School, Ruprecht-Karls-University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
C BeiersmannInstitute of Public Health, Medical School, Ruprecht-Karls-University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna · BFHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination has contributed to major reductions in global morbidity and mortality, but there remain significant coverage gaps. Better knowledge on the interplay between population and health systems regarding provision of vaccination information and regarding health staff organization during the immunization sessions appears to be important for improvements of vaccination effectiveness.

methodsThe study was conducted in the Nouna Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) area, rural Burkina Faso, from March to April 2014. We employed a combination of in-depth interviews (n = 29) and focus group discussions (n = 4) including children's mothers, health workers, godmothers, community health workers and traditional healers. A thematic analysis was performed. All material was transcribed, translated and analyzed using the software ATLAS.ti4.2.

resultsThere was better social mobilization in the rural areas as compared to the urban area. Most mothers know the Expanded Program of Immunization (EPI) target diseases, and the importance to immunize their children. However, the great majority of informants reported that mothers don't know the vaccination schedule. There is awareness that some children are incompletely vaccinated. Mentioned reasons for that were migration, mothers being busy with their work, the practice of not opening vaccine vials unless a critical number of children are present, poor interaction between women and health workers during immunization sessions, potential adverse events associated with vaccination, geographic inaccessibility during rainy season, and lack of information.

conclusionsWell organized vaccination programs are a key factor to improve child health and there is a clear need to consider community perceptions on program performance. In Burkina Faso, a number of factors have been identified which need attention by the EPI managers for further improvement of program effectiveness.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRural PopulationBurkina FasoChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantMaleMothersProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchVaccinationBurkina FasoChildhood vaccinationCommunity perceptionQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID29510684
PMCPMC5840732
OpenAlexW2790484228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.