ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2018
Flow Preservation of Umbilical Vein for Autologous Shunt and Cardiovascular Reconstruction.
Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic analysis of the influence of enzymatic and chemical detergents on structure, biomechanics and biocompatibility of decellularized vascular grafts.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Article
- Regeneration of Vascular Endothelium in Different Large Vessels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Hemodynamics and Wall Mechanics of Vascular Graft Failure.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSynthetic graft materials are commonly used for shunts and cardiovascular reconstruction in neonates, but are prone to thrombosis and scarring. The umbilical vein is a potential source of autologous, endothelialized tissue for neonatal shunts and tissue reconstruction, but requires preservation before implantation.
methodsUmbilical cords were collected in UW solution with antibiotics at 4°C until dissection. Umbilical vein segments were tested for burst pressure before and after 2 weeks of preservation. Umbilical veins segments were preserved under static or flow conditions at 4°C in UW solution with 5% human plasma lysate for 7 days. Veins were evaluated with histopathology, scanning electron microscopy, and platelet adhesion testing.
resultsUmbilical veins have no difference in burst pressure at harvest (n = 16) compared with 2 weeks of preservation (n = 11; 431 ± 229 versus 438 ± 244 mm Hg). After 1 week, static and flow-preserved veins showed viability of the vessel segments with endothelium staining positive for CD31, von Willebrand factor, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated preservation of normal endothelial morphology and flow alignment in the flow-preserved samples compared with cobblestone endothelial appearance and some endothelial cell loss in the static samples. Static samples had significantly more platelet adhesion than flow-preserved samples did.
conclusionsUmbilical veins have adequate burst strength to function at neonatal systemic pressures. Preservation under flow conditions demonstrated normal endothelial and overall vascular morphology with less platelet adhesion compared with static samples. Preserved autologous umbilical veins are potential source for endothelialized shunts or cardiovascular repair tissue for neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.