Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29509892›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2018

Surgical treatment versus conventional chest tube drainage in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized controlled trial.

Winnie Hedevang Olesen, Niels Katballe, Jesper Eske Sindby, Ingrid Louise Titlestad, Poul Erik Andersen, Rune Lindahl-Jacobsen, Peter Bjørn Licht

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Immediate Surgery for First Episode PSP: Is It Overtreatment?Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. New strategies in the management of pneumothorax.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CT features associated with contralateral recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Winnie Hedevang OlesenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Niels KatballeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jesper Eske SindbyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ingrid Louise TitlestadDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Poul Erik AndersenDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Rune Lindahl-JacobsenDanish Aging Research Center, Unit of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Peter Bjørn LichtDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrimary spontaneous pneumothorax frequently recurs after chest tube management. Evidence is lacking whether patients may benefit from surgery following their first episode.

methodsWe performed a multicentre, randomized trial and enrolled young, otherwise healthy patients admitted with their first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax and treated using conventional chest tube drainage. Patients underwent high-resolution computed tomography on fully expanded lungs, and using web-based randomization, we assigned patients to continued conservative chest tube treatment or chest tube treatment followed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with the resection of bullae/blebs and mechanical pleurodesis. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence of bullae ≥1 cm on high-resolution computed tomography. The primary end point was readmission with ipsilateral recurrence. Secondary end points were complications and length of hospitalization.

resultsBetween 1 August 2009 and 4 November 2016, we screened 457 patients, of whom 373 were eligible for inclusion and 181 were enrolled: male/female ratio = 5.0. We identified 88 patients with blebs <1 cm: 50 were randomly assigned to chest tube treatment and 38 to VATS. Ninety-three patients had bullae ≥1 cm: 43 were randomly assigned to chest tube treatment and 50 to VATS. Forty-three (23.8%) patients experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. Overall, recurrence was significantly lower following VATS when compared with conventional chest tube treatment (P = 0.0012). When stratified by bullae size, VATS proved significantly better for bullae ≥1 cm (P = 0.014). We observed a size-response relationship with increased risk of recurrence for larger bullae (P = 0.013).

conclusionsSurgery was an effective treatment to prevent recurrence in patients with their first presentation of primary spontaneous pneumothorax and should be the standard of care when high-resolution computed tomography demonstrates bullae ≥2 cm. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT 02866305.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChest TubesDrainageFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePleurodesisPneumothoraxRecurrenceThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29509892
OpenAlexW2757503461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.