ArticleThe Journal of family practice2018
PURLs: An easy approach to obtaining clean-catch urine from infants.
Article in The Journal of family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: Current Concepts and Therapeutic Options.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
A fussy 6-month-old infant is brought into the emergency department with a rectal temperature of 101.5 degrees F. She is consolable, breathing normally, and appears well hydrated. You find no clear etiology for her fever and suspect that a urinary tract infection may be the source of her illness. How do you proceed with obtaining a urine sample?
Indexed as
Identifiers
29509820PMC5849230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.