Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29509786›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Imaging systems and algorithms to analyze biological samples in real-time using mobile phone microscopy.

Akshaya Shanmugam, Mohammad Usmani, Addison Mayberry, David L Perkins, Daniel E Holcomb

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akshaya ShanmugamLumme Inc., Amherst, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6125-9735
Mohammad UsmaniElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States of America.
Addison MayberryCollege of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States of America.
David L PerkinsRichard Cronin Aquatic Resource Center, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Sunderland, MA, United States of America.
Daniel E HolcombElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miniaturized imaging devices have pushed the boundaries of point-of-care imaging, but existing mobile-phone-based imaging systems do not exploit the full potential of smart phones. This work demonstrates the use of simple imaging configurations to deliver superior image quality and the ability to handle a wide range of biological samples. Results presented in this work are from analysis of fluorescent beads under fluorescence imaging, as well as helminth eggs and freshwater mussel larvae under white light imaging. To demonstrate versatility of the systems, real time analysis and post-processing results of the sample count and sample size are presented in both still images and videos of flowing samples.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBivalviaCell PhoneEggsEquipment DesignHelminthsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLarvaMicrofluidicsMicroscopyOptical ImagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedPrinting, Three-Dimensional

Identifiers

PMID29509786
PMCPMC5839566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.