Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29509546›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2018

A PET imaging agent for evaluating PARP-1 expression in ovarian cancer.

Mehran Makvandi, Austin Pantel, Lauren Schwartz, Erin Schubert, Kuiying Xu, Chia-Ju Hsieh, Catherine Hou, Hyoung Kim, Chi-Chang Weng, Harrison Winters and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02637934 (Phase I Pilot Study of Biodistribution, Metabolism and Excretion of Novel Radiotracer [18F]Fluorthanatrace), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02637934 phase1recruitingnot on this map

Phase I Pilot Study of Biodistribution, Metabolism and Excretion of Novel Radiotracer [18F]Fluorthanatrace (FTT) by PET/CT

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2016 to 2026Enrolled35ConditionsSuspected Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal CancerArms[18F]FluorThanatrace, PET/CT imaging sessions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Next Frontier in Quantitative Co-Clinical Imaging to Advance Functional Precision Oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  2. PET Imaging of New Target PARP in Prostate Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Communications medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. CRISPR-epigenetic crosstalk: From bidirectional regulation to therapeutic potential.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Kinetic Analysis and Metabolism of Poly(Adenosine Diphosphate-Ribose) Polymerase-1-TargetedJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Molecular Genetics of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2024
    Article
  18. Pharmacodynamic Activity of [JCO precision oncology · 2024
    Article
  19. [Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mehran MakvandiDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Austin PantelDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lauren SchwartzDepartment of Pathology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Erin SchubertDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kuiying XuDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chia-Ju HsiehDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Catherine HouDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hyoung KimDepartment of OBGYN, Division of Gynecology and Oncology.
Chi-Chang WengDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Harrison WintersDepartment of Cancer Biology, and.
Robert DootDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael D FarwellDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel A PrymaDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Roger A GreenbergDepartment of Cancer Biology, and.
David A MankoffDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fiona SimpkinsDepartment of OBGYN, Division of Gynecology and Oncology.
Robert H MachDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lilie L LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USGainesville Obstetrics & Gynecology · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Physician Scientist Training in Clinical OncologyK12CA076931 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STEPHEN Patrick HUNGER, LYNN M. SCHUCHTER · 1997 to 2026
$16.5M
Roles of Chromatin Modification in BRCA1 Dependent DNA RepairR01CA174904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Roger A Greenberg · 2013 to 2026
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA076931NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective in a broad population of patients with ovarian cancer; however, resistance caused by low enzyme expression of the drug target PARP-1 remains to be clinically evaluated in this context. We hypothesize that PARP-1 expression is variable in ovarian cancer and can be quantified in primary and metastatic disease using a novel PET imaging agent.

methodsWe used a translational approach to describe the significance of PET imaging of PARP-1 in ovarian cancer. First, we produced PARP1-KO ovarian cancer cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to test the loss of PARP-1 as a resistance mechanism to all clinically used PARP inhibitors. Next, we performed preclinical microPET imaging studies using ovarian cancer patient-derived xenografts in mouse models. Finally, in a phase I PET imaging clinical trial we explored PET imaging as a regional marker of PARP-1 expression in primary and metastatic disease through correlative tissue histology.

resultsWe found that deletion of PARP1 causes resistance to all PARP inhibitors in vitro, and microPET imaging provides proof of concept as an approach to quantify PARP-1 in vivo. Clinically, we observed a spectrum of standard uptake values (SUVs) ranging from 2-12 for PARP-1 in tumors. In addition, we found a positive correlation between PET SUVs and fluorescent immunohistochemistry for PARP-1 (r2 = 0.60).

conclusionThis work confirms the translational potential of a PARP-1 PET imaging agent and supports future clinical trials to test PARP-1 expression as a method to stratify patients for PARP inhibitor therapy.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02637934.

fundingResearch reported in this publication was supported by the Department of Defense OC160269, a Basser Center team science grant, NIH National Cancer Institute R01CA174904, a Department of Energy training grant DE-SC0012476, Abramson Cancer Center Radiation Oncology pilot grants, the Marsha Rivkin Foundation, Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation, and Paul Calabresi K12 Career Development Award 5K12CA076931.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmOvarian NeoplasmsPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAnimalsCell Line, TumorContrast MediaFemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm TransplantationContrast MediaNeoplasm ProteinsPARP1 protein, humanPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsDiagnostic imagingMolecular biologyOncologyPharmacologyTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID29509546
PMCPMC5919879
OpenAlexW2791912178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.