Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29508942›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA2018

Intron retention in viruses and cellular genes: Detention, border controls and passports.

David Rekosh, Marie-Louise Hammarskjold

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Measurement of HIV Rev-Rev Response Element Functional Activity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Unleashing the potential of catalytic RNAs to combat mis-spliced transcripts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David RekoshThe Myles H. Thaler Center for AIDS and Human Retrovirus Research and the Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Marie-Louise HammarskjoldThe Myles H. Thaler Center for AIDS and Human Retrovirus Research and the Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
University of Venda · ZAUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

HIV, HERV-K and Human CancerR01CA206275 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HAMMARSKJOLD, MARIE-LOUISE, REKOSH, DAVID M · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
Sam 68 and the Function of Mason Pfizer Monkey Virus CTER01CA097095 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI HAMMARSKJOLD, MARIE-LOUISE · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
HIV Rev FunctionR01AI054335 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI HAMMARSKJOLD, MARIE-LOUISE · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
Functional Variation of Rev and RRE Activity During HIV InfectionR01GM110009 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HAMMARSKJOLD, MARIE-LOUISE, REKOSH, DAVID M · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NXF Proteins, Cofactors and TargetsR01GM087651 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HAMMARSKJOLD, MARIE-LOUISE · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097095NCI NIH HHS R01 CA206275NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI054335NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087651NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intron retention (IR), where one or more introns remain in the RNA after splicing, was long thought to be rare in mammalian cells, albeit common in plants and some viruses. Largely due to the development of better methods for RNA analysis, it has now been recognized that IR is much more common than previously thought and that this mechanism is likely to play an important role in mammalian gene regulation. To date, most publications and reviews about IR have described the resulting mRNAs as "dead end" products, with no direct consequence for the proteome. However, there are also many reports of mRNAs with retained introns giving rise to alternative protein isoforms. Although this was originally revealed in viral systems, there are now numerous examples of bona fide cellular proteins that are translated from mRNAs with retained introns. These new isoforms have sometimes been shown to have important regulatory functions. In this review, we highlight recent developments in this area and the research on viruses that led the way to the realization of the many ways in which mRNAs with retained introns can be regulated. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > Splicing Mechanisms RNA Processing > Splicing Regulation/Alternative Splicing RNA Export and Localization > Nuclear Export/Import RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes.

Indexed as

IntronsAlternative SplicingAnimalsHumansRetroviridaeRNA, MessengerRNA, Messengeralternative splicingCTEsintron retentionnucelocytoplasmic exportRNA ExportRNA splicing

Identifiers

PMID29508942
PMCPMC5910242
OpenAlexW2791044822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.