Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29508661›Full record

SynthesisActa orthopaedica2018

RSA migration of total knee replacements.

Bart G Pijls, José W M Plevier, Rob G H H Nelissen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta orthopaedica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05151315 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Component Migration, Polyethylene Wear, and Joint Inflammation of the Evolution Versus Evolution NitrX Total Knee Arthroplasty System

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2022 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsTotal Knee Arthroplasty, Knee Osteoarthritis, Radiostereometric AnalysisArmsTotal Knee Arthroplasty with Evolution® NitrX™ Knee System, Total Knee Arthroplasty with Evolution Knee System
NCT05877261 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

5 Year Follow-Up of Migration of a Cementless Total Knee Replacement

TypeobservationalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2023 to 2024Enrolled18ConditionsKnee Arthroplasty, Total, Knee Osteoarthritis, Radiostereometric AnalysisArmsCementless Total Knee Replacement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bart G Pijlsa Department of Orthopaedics , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden.
José W M Plevierb Walaeus Library , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.
Rob G H H Nelissena Department of Orthopaedics , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose - We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to evaluate the early and long-term migration patterns of tibial components of TKR of all known RSA studies. Methods - Migration pattern was defined as at least 2 postoperative RSA follow-up moments. Maximal total point motion (MTPM) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years were considered. Results - The literature search yielded 1,167 hits of which 53 studies were included, comprising 111 study groups and 2,470 knees. The majority of the early migration occurred in the first 6 months postoperatively followed by a period of stability, i.e., no or very little migration. Cemented and uncemented tibial components had different migration patterns. For cemented tibial components there was no difference in migration between all-poly and metal-backed components, between mobile bearing and fixed bearing, between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized. Furthermore, no difference existed between TKR measured with model-based RSA or marker-based RSA methods. For uncemented TKR there was some variation in migration with the highest migration for uncoated TKR. Interpretation - The results from this meta-analysis on RSA migration of TKR are in line with both the survival analyses results from joint registries of these TKRs as well as revision rates results from meta-analyses, thus providing further proof for the association between early migration and late revision for loosening. The pooled migration patterns can be used both as benchmarks and for defining migration thresholds for future evaluation of new TKR.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansKnee ProsthesisProsthesis FailureRadiostereometric Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29508661
PMCPMC6055769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.