ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018
Measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with reduced scan time.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capillary-Associated Microglia in Neurovascular Coupling: Localization, Mechanisms, and Disease Implications.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Neutrophil extracellular traps and microglia/macrophages interactions in stroke: from thromboinflammation to immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Improving measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability with reduced scan time using deep-learning-derived capillary input function.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Measuring water exchange on a preclinical MRI system using filter exchange and diffusion time dependent kurtosis imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Contrast-Free Detection of Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
- Extended perfusion protocol for MS lesion quantification.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2020Article
- Feasibility of measuring blood-brain barrier permeability using ultra-short echo time radial magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
- Quantification of Blood-Brain-Barrier Permeability Dysregulation and Inflammatory Activity in MS Lesions by Dynamic-Contrast Enhanced MR Imaging.Basic and clinical neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the feasibility of measuring the subtle disruption of blood-brain barrier (BBB) using DCE-MRI with a scan duration shorter than 10 min.
methodsThe extended Patlak-model (EPM) was introduced to include the effect of plasma flow (F
resultsThe simulation study results demonstrated that scan time reduction could lead to larger bias in PS estimated by PM (>2000%) than by EPM (<47%), especially when F
conclusionThe results of this study suggest that EPM can be used to measure PS with a scan duration of 10 min or less.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.