Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29508394›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2018

Loss of GABA

Bojana Kokinovic, Paolo Medini

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for Neural Plasticity in Stroke Recovery.Archives of internal medicine research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rethinking Remapping: Circuit Mechanisms of Recovery after Stroke.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Rapid and Bihemispheric Reorganization of Neuronal Activity in Premotor Cortex after Brain Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacological mechanisms of interhemispheric signal propagation: a TMS-EEG study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  11. Interhemispheric plasticity is mediated by maximal potentiation of callosal inputs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bojana KokinovicDepartment of Integrative Medical Biology (IMB), Physiology section, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Paolo MediniDepartment of Integrative Medical Biology (IMB), Physiology section, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3796-8221
Italian Institute of Technology · ITUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsRecovery from the potentially devastating consequences of stroke depends largely upon plastic changes occurring in the lesion periphery and its inputs. In a focal model of stroke in mouse somatosensory cortex, we found that the recovery of sensory responsiveness occurs at the level of synaptic inputs, without gross changes of the intrinsic electrical excitability of neurons, and also that recovered responses had longer than normal latencies. Under normal conditions, one somatosensory cortex inhibits the responsiveness of the other located in the opposite hemisphere (interhemispheric inhibition) via activation of GABA ABSTRACT: Recovery after stroke is mediated by plastic changes largely occurring in the lesion periphery. However, little is known about the microcircuit changes underlying recovery, the extent to which perilesional plasticity occurs at synaptic input vs. spike output level, and the connectivity behind such synaptic plasticity. We combined intrinsic imaging with extracellular and intracellular recordings and pharmacological inactivation in a focal stroke in mouse somatosensory cortex (S1). In vivo whole-cell recordings in hindlimb S1 (hS1) showed synaptic responses also to forelimb stimulation in controls, and such responses were abolished by stroke in the neighbouring forelimb area (fS1), suggesting that, under normal conditions, they originate via horizontal connections from the neighbouring fS1. Synaptic and spike responses to forelimb stimulation in hS1 recovered to quasi-normal levels 2 weeks after stroke, without changes in intrinsic excitability and hindlimb-evoked spike responses. Recovered synaptic responses had longer latencies, suggesting a long-range origin of the recovery, prompting us to investigate the role of callosal inputs in the recovery process. Contralesional S1 silencing unmasked significantly larger responses to both limbs in controls, a phenomenon that was not observed when GABA

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAnimalsCorpus CallosumFunctional LateralityMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReceptors, GABA-BSomatosensory CortexStrokeSynapsesReceptors, GABA-Bcortical physiologyinterhemispheric inhibitionstroke-driven plasticity

Identifiers

PMID29508394
PMCPMC5978350
OpenAlexW2806230404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.