ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019
Development of a Measurement Tool to Assess Students' Knowledge and Perceptions About Cancer (SKPaC).
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Education About Breast Cancer for Medical Students in China.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020Trial
- Assessing Cancer Knowledge among Health Students in Portugal.Portuguese journal of public health · 2025Article
- Geographic, Demographic, and Socioeconomic Disparities and Factors Associated With Cancer Literacy in China: National Cross-sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer literacy is currently one of the most important dimensions of cancer continuum. Objective assessment of cancer knowledge in populations remains a challenging field to public health entities. Different evaluation tools are currently available; still, some groups remain disregarded due to the absence of validated instruments. Cancer literacy in adolescents and young adults has been clearly overlooked being a subject that requires new tools to be properly studied. To address this topic, we developed a new instrument and field tested it in a classroom environment for internal reliability, construct, and face validity. "Students Knowledge and Perceptions about Cancer questionnaire" was designed in Portuguese language and adapted to the Portuguese context by a multidisciplinary team. The final version of the questionnaire includes 35 items organized in three sections, encompassing knowledge and perceptions about cancer and socio-biographic data. Cancer experts ensured content validity, while tailoring of contents was refined with high school teachers. Test and retest of the instrument showed a good reliability of the scale and construct validity. Also, the clarity of the questionnaire and suitability to proper evaluate cancer knowledge was consistent between test and retest. The Students' Knowledge and Perceptions About Cancer Questionnaire (SKPaC) showed to be a valid tool to assess adolescents' knowledge and perceptions about cancer that can be used in the educational context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29508229What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.