Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29508218›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2018

Comparative Quality of Life in Patients Following Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery and Healthy Control Subjects.

Stefan H E M Clermonts, Yu-Ting van Loon, Dareczka K Wasowicz, Barbara S Langenhoff, David D E Zimmerman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Completion Total Mesorectal Excision: A Case-Matched Comparison With Primary Resection.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Outcomes of completion total mesorectal excision are not compromised by prior transanal minimally invasive surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan H E M ClermontsDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital), 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Yu-Ting van LoonDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital), 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Dareczka K WasowiczDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital), 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Barbara S LangenhoffDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital), 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
David D E ZimmermanDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital), 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands. d.zimmerman@etz.nl.
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is considered the successor of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS). It makes use of more readily available laparoscopic instruments and single-port access platforms with similar perioperative, clinical and oncological outcomes. Little is known about quality of life (QoL) outcomes after the use of TAMIS. The aim of this study was to assess QoL after TAMIS in our patients and compare this with QoL in the healthy Dutch population.

methodsAll patients undergoing TAMIS for selected rectal neoplasms between October 2011 and March 2014 were included in this analysis. Patients were studied for a minimal period of 24 months. QoL outcomes were measured using the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire; faecal continence was measured using the Faecal Incontinence Severity Index questionnaire. Patient reported outcomes were compared to case-matched healthy Dutch control subjects. We hypothesise that undergoing TAMIS will subsequently result in a decreased quality of life in patients compared to healthy individuals.

resultsThirty-seven patients (m:f = 17:20, median 67 years) were included in the current analysis. In four patients (10.8%), postoperative complications occurred. The median follow-up was 36 (range 21-47) months. Postoperative QoL scores are similar comparable to those reported by Dutch healthy controls. Patients reported a statistically significant better QoL score in the 'bodily pain' domain when compared to the controls (81.8 vs. 74.1 points) (p = 0.01). Significant worse QoL scores for the 'social functioning' domain were reported by patients after TAMIS (84.4 vs. 100 points) (p = 0.03).

conclusionTAMIS seems to be a safe technique with postoperative QoL scores similar to that of healthy case matched controls in 3-year follow-up. There seems to be no association between faecal incontinence and reported QoL. Negative effects of TAMIS on social functioning of patients should not be underestimated and should be discussed during preoperative counselling.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRectal NeoplasmsSocial ParticipationTreatment OutcomeFunctional outcomeQoLQuality of lifeSF-36TAMISTEMTransanal minimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID29508218
OpenAlexW2794007579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.