ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2018
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left bundle branch area pacing: A promising modality for cardiac resynchronization therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- The Past, Present and Future of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Korean circulation journal · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important therapeutic tool in the management of patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony. In appropriately selected patients, landmark randomized controlled trials have demonstrated morbidity and mortality benefit beyond standard goal-directed medical therapy. Current guidelines emphasize the greatest clinical efficacy of CRT in patients with symptomatic heart failure, left bundle branch block, and wide QRS duration (> 150 ms). Other relevant considerations include the presence of atrial fibrillation, the presence of AV block, the etiology of cardiomyopathy, the presence of masked left-sided conduction delay, and the impact of comorbidities that might predict poor clinical response. At the time of CRT implantation, key considerations include targeting of the left ventricular (LV) lead to sites of greatest electrical and/or mechanical delay, the use of quadripolar versus bipolar LV pacing leads, evaluation of multiple pacing vectors to maximize electrical resynchronization, and in select instances pre-procedure imaging of the coronary venous anatomy to help guide decision-making at the time implant. Post-implant care includes the selective use of atrio-ventricular and inter-ventricular optimization algorithms, mitigation of right ventricular pacing, recognition, and treatment of suboptimal biventricular pacing, as well as management by a multi-disciplinary team of cardiovascular specialists. Emerging therapeutic strategies for patients eligible for CRT include the use of endocardial LV pacing, novel LV pacing options including multi-point pacing, His bundle pacing, and the integration of remote monitoring platforms that may identify patients at risk for clinical worsening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.