Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29508013›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2018

An ecological study of the link between the risk of most frequent types of cancer in Poland and socioeconomic variables.

Katarzyna Orlewska, Andrzej Sliwczynski, Ewa Orlewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarzyna OrlewskaMedical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej SliwczynskiMedical University in Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Ewa OrlewskaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Al. IX Wieków Kielc 19, 25-317, Kielce, Poland. eorl@ujk.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the link between the risks of most frequent cancer sites in Poland and selected socioeconomic variables that potentially affect health outcomes throughout the life course.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional ecological study. Incidence of lung, breast, and colon cancer by voivodeships in 2014 was calculated based on Polish National Cancer Registry. Socioeconomic variables in individual voivodeships were assessed based on Polish Social Cohesion Survey for 2015. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to test the association of incidence rates and socioeconomic variables. The significance level was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed tests).

resultsStatistically significant negative correlation exists between: (1) friend-/neighbour-based social capital and colon and breast cancer, (2) association-based social capital and lung cancer, (3) high religiousness and lung and breast cancer, and (4) income poverty and breast cancer. Statistically significant positive correlation exists between: (1) social isolation, living conditions poverty, poverty resulting from the lack of budget balance, and lung cancer; (2) low/no involvement in religious activity and lung and breast cancer.

conclusionsOur findings support public health concerns over the implication of socioeconomic environment for cancer.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasmsPolandRegistriesRiskSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer riskPovertyReligiousnessSocial capitalSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID29508013
PMCPMC6154031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.