ReviewNPJ microgravity2018
Anaesthesia in austere environments: literature review and considerations for future space exploration missions.
Review in NPJ microgravity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during spaceflight - a guideline for CPR in microgravity from the German Society of Aerospace Medicine (DGLRM) and the European Society of Aerospace Medicine Space Medicine Group (ESAM-SMG).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020Guideline
- Using supraglottic airways by paramedics for airway management in analogue microgravity increases speed and success of ventilation.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Surgery for interplanetary space missions.The British journal of surgery · 2026Review
- A high-fidelity simulator for evaluation of hemodynamic response during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hypogravity environments.NPJ microgravity · 2026Article
- Feasibility of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in simulated microgravity: a proof-of-concept study for regional anaesthesia during deep space missions.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Evaluation of free-floating tracheal intubation in weightlessness via ice-pick position with a direct laryngoscopy and classic approach with indirect videolaryngoscopy.NPJ microgravity · 2023Article
- Surgery in the Next Space Missions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Effectiveness of CPR in Hypogravity Conditions-A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Randomized Comparison of Two New Methods for Chest Compressions during CPR in Microgravity-A Manikin Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A Study on the Role of Intelligent Medical Simulation Systems in Teaching First Aid Competence in Anesthesiology.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Facing Trauma and Surgical Emergency in Space: Hemorrhagic Shock.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Robot-assisted surgery in space: pros and cons. A review from the surgeon's point of view.NPJ microgravity · 2021Review
- Use of spinal anaesthesia in neonates and infants in Antananarivo, Madagascar: a retrospective descriptive study.BMC research notes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Future space exploration missions will take humans far beyond low Earth orbit and require complete crew autonomy. The ability to provide anaesthesia will be important given the expected risk of severe medical events requiring surgery. Knowledge and experience of such procedures during space missions is currently extremely limited. Austere and isolated environments (such as polar bases or submarines) have been used extensively as test beds for spaceflight to probe hazards, train crews, develop clinical protocols and countermeasures for prospective space missions. We have conducted a literature review on anaesthesia in austere environments relevant to distant space missions. In each setting, we assessed how the problems related to the provision of anaesthesia (e.g., medical kit and skills) are dealt with or prepared for. We analysed how these factors could be applied to the unique environment of a space exploration mission. The delivery of anaesthesia will be complicated by many factors including space-induced physiological changes and limitations in skills and equipment. The basic principles of a safe anaesthesia in an austere environment (appropriate training, presence of minimal safety and monitoring equipment, etc.) can be extended to the context of a space exploration mission. Skills redundancy is an important safety factor, and basic competency in anaesthesia should be part of the skillset of several crewmembers. The literature suggests that safe and effective anaesthesia could be achieved by a physician during future space exploration missions. In a life-or-limb situation, non-physicians may be able to conduct anaesthetic procedures, including simplified general anaesthesia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.