Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507873›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2018

Anaesthesia in austere environments: literature review and considerations for future space exploration missions.

Matthieu Komorowski, Sarah Fleming, Mala Mawkin, Jochen Hinkelbein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Surgery for interplanetary space missions.The British journal of surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Surgery in the Next Space Missions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Facing Trauma and Surgical Emergency in Space: Hemorrhagic Shock.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthieu Komorowski1Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Exhibition road, London, SW7 2AZ UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0559-5747
Sarah FlemingMaidstone Hospital, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, ME16 9QQ UK.
Mala Mawkin1Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Exhibition road, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
Jochen Hinkelbein5Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, Köln, 50937 Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Future space exploration missions will take humans far beyond low Earth orbit and require complete crew autonomy. The ability to provide anaesthesia will be important given the expected risk of severe medical events requiring surgery. Knowledge and experience of such procedures during space missions is currently extremely limited. Austere and isolated environments (such as polar bases or submarines) have been used extensively as test beds for spaceflight to probe hazards, train crews, develop clinical protocols and countermeasures for prospective space missions. We have conducted a literature review on anaesthesia in austere environments relevant to distant space missions. In each setting, we assessed how the problems related to the provision of anaesthesia (e.g., medical kit and skills) are dealt with or prepared for. We analysed how these factors could be applied to the unique environment of a space exploration mission. The delivery of anaesthesia will be complicated by many factors including space-induced physiological changes and limitations in skills and equipment. The basic principles of a safe anaesthesia in an austere environment (appropriate training, presence of minimal safety and monitoring equipment, etc.) can be extended to the context of a space exploration mission. Skills redundancy is an important safety factor, and basic competency in anaesthesia should be part of the skillset of several crewmembers. The literature suggests that safe and effective anaesthesia could be achieved by a physician during future space exploration missions. In a life-or-limb situation, non-physicians may be able to conduct anaesthetic procedures, including simplified general anaesthesia.

Identifiers

PMID29507873
PMCPMC5824960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.