Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507688›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Prognostic implications of HER2 heterogeneity in gastric cancer.

Shigenobu Motoshima, Koji Yonemoto, Hideki Kamei, Michi Morita, Rin Yamaguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer 2025: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Down-regulation of stimulator of interferon genes (STING) expression and CD8Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Pathology of Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shigenobu MotoshimaBiostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koji YonemotoAdvanced Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan.
Hideki KameiDepartment of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Kurume General Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Michi MoritaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Rin YamaguchiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kurume University Medical Center, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic implications of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) heterogeneity in gastric cancer (GC) are not well established. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine to the effect of HER2 status on the prognosis of GC patients. We retrieved data on 248 pathologically-confirmed, consecutive patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-esophageal junction who underwent surgical resection at Kurume University Medical Center between July 2000 and December 2012. HER2 status was classified as HER2 positive or negative and HER2 heterogeneity or homogeneity. The endpoint was overall survival (OS), which was compared using the generalized Wilcoxon test. HER2 status was positive in 36 patients (14.5%) and negative in 212 patients (85.5%). Among the 36 HER2 positive patients, 25 patients (69.4%) had HER2 heterogeneity and the remaining 11 patients (30.6%) had HER2 homogeneity. Among the 141 patients with stage III or IV disease, the prognosis of the HER2 homogeneity group was significantly worse than that of the HER2 heterogeneity group (

Indexed as

gastric cancerHER2intratumoral heterogeneityprognosistrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID29507688
PMCPMC5823644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.