Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507599›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2018

Hydrogen sulphide exposure in waste water treatment.

Åse Dalseth Austigard, Kristin Svendsen, Kari K Heldal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Occupational Health Risk Assessment for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in Kanpur, India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mesoporous Poly(melamine-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Åse Dalseth AustigardMunicipality of Trondheim, Working Environment Office, Trondheim, Norway.
Kristin Svendsen2Institute of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Alfred Getz vei 3, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3338-8470
Kari K Heldal3The National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this study was to assess exposure to hydrogen sulphide (H

methodsNinety-three measurements of H

resultsNine Percent (8 of 93) of all H

conclusionsThe use of a H

Indexed as

Exposure indexHydrogen sulphidePeak exposureWaste water workers

Identifiers

PMID29507599
PMCPMC5831676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.