Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507574›Full record

ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2017

General self-efficacy level and health behaviours in women over the age of 45 years who have undergone osteoporosis treatment.

Mariola Janiszewska, Teresa Kulik, Dorota Żołnierczuk-Kieliszek, Barłomiej Drop, Ewelina Firlej, Ilona Gajewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariola JaniszewskaDepartment Health Sciences, Chair of Public Health, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Teresa KulikDepartment Health Sciences, Chair of Public Health, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Dorota Żołnierczuk-KieliszekDepartment Health Sciences, Chair of Public Health, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Barłomiej DropDepartment of Computer Science and Medical Statistics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Ewelina FirlejDepartment Health Sciences, Chair of Public Health, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Ilona GajewskaDepartment of Computer Science and Medical Statistics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContemporary people do not follow the civilisation development in every life domain, their lifestyle is not always healthy. Self-efficacy is the factor that plays an important role in undertaking actions towards struggling with the disease. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between the general self-efficacy level and health behaviours as well as chosen sociodemographic features in women over the age of 45 years who have undergone osteoporosis treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study comprised 151 women over the age of 45 years. The research was conducted in 2016 in health care centres in Lublin, a city in south-eastern Poland. The Generalised Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) by R. Schwarzer, M. Jerusalem and Z. Juczyński and an original questionnaire were used as research tools. The obtained material was subjected to descriptive and statistical analysis. χ

resultsThe analysis of obtained results showed that as much as 73.5% of the respondents showed very low and low generalised self-efficacy level. On the other hand, only 22.5% of the examined were characterised by high and very high generalised self-efficacy level. The longer the duration of osteoporosis treatment (rho = 0.251;

conclusionsThe generalized self-efficacy level and the health behaviours are not satisfactory.

Indexed as

general self-efficacy levelmenopauseosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID29507574
PMCPMC5834921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.