Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507492›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2018

Self-collection for under-screened women in a National Cervical Screening Program: pilot study.

M Saville, D Hawkes, E Mclachlan, S Anderson, K Arabena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Performance and acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus testing among women living with HIV.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Design and Evaluation of Community-Informed Video Resources to Promote Safe and Inclusive Cervical Screening for South Australian LGBTIQ+ People With a Cervix.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical Performance of the RealTiMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M SavilleVictorian Cytology Service, Carlton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
D HawkesVictorian Cytology Service, Carlton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
E MclachlanIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; and.
S AndersonBallarat and District Aboriginal Collective, Baarlinjan Medical Clinic, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
K ArabenaIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; and.
University of Melbourne · AUBallarat Health Services · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommencing 1 December 2017, Australia introduced human papillomavirus (hpv)-based cervical screening. As part of this Australian renewed National Cervical Screening Program (ncsp) women who are either never- or under-screened and who refuse a practitioner collected sample will be able to collect their own sample for cervical screening. The aim of this study is to examine the quantitative results of a pilot study into the acceptability of the self-collection alternative pathway.

methodsEligible participants were offered the opportunity to collect their own sample. Those who agreed were given a flocked swab and an instruction sheet and took their own sample in an area of the health care clinic that afforded them adequate privacy. These samples were then given to clinic staff who returned them to Victorian Cytology Service (vcs) Pathology for hpv nucleic acid testing.

resultsOf 98 eligible women, seventy-nine undertook self-collection for hpv-based cervical screening. Seventy-seven produced valid results, 14 were positive for oncogenic hpv, with 10 undertaking follow-up. Three women were found to have cervical squamous abnormalities with two of those being high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesions.

conclusionThe pilot study for self-collection for cervical screening produced quantitative data that were similar to that already reported in the literature, but had a much higher rate of acceptance compared with self-collection programs based in the home.

Indexed as

cervical cancer screeningdiagnostic testingHuman papillomavirus (hpv)self-collection

Identifiers

PMID29507492
PMCPMC5832287
OpenAlexW2793100336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.