Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507254›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Protein homology model refinement by large-scale energy optimization.

Hahnbeom Park, Sergey Ovchinnikov, David E Kim, Frank DiMaio, David Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design of High Affinity Binders to Convex Protein Target Sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative modeling and docking of chemokine-receptor interactions with Rosetta.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hahnbeom ParkDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.ORCID 0000-0002-7129-1912
Sergey OvchinnikovDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.
David E KimInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.
Frank DiMaioDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.ORCID 0000-0002-7524-8938
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105; dabaker@u.washington.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7896-6217

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
Protein structure determination from low-resolution experimental dataR01GM123089 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DIMAIO, FRANK P · 2017 to 2025
$2.6M
High resolution structure modeling with RosettaR01GM092802 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAKER, DAVID · 2010 to 2017
$2.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092802NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123089NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins fold to their lowest free-energy structures, and hence the most straightforward way to increase the accuracy of a partially incorrect protein structure model is to search for the lowest-energy nearby structure. This direct approach has met with little success for two reasons: first, energy function inaccuracies can lead to false energy minima, resulting in model degradation rather than improvement; and second, even with an accurate energy function, the search problem is formidable because the energy only drops considerably in the immediate vicinity of the global minimum, and there are a very large number of degrees of freedom. Here we describe a large-scale energy optimization-based refinement method that incorporates advances in both search and energy function accuracy that can substantially improve the accuracy of low-resolution homology models. The method refined low-resolution homology models into correct folds for 50 of 84 diverse protein families and generated improved models in recent blind structure prediction experiments. Analyses of the basis for these improvements reveal contributions from both the improvements in conformational sampling techniques and the energy function.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, ChemicalComputational BiologyModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProtein FoldingThermodynamicsenergy functionhomology modelingprotein conformational searchprotein structure predictionprotein structure refinement

Identifiers

PMID29507254
PMCPMC5866580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.