Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507209›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Linking imaging to omics utilizing image-guided tissue extraction.

Jonathan A Disselhorst, Marcel A Krueger, S M Minhaz Ud-Dean, Ilja Bezrukov, Mohamed A Jarboui, Christoph Trautwein, Andreas Traube, Christian Spindler, Jonathan M Cotton, Dieter Leibfritz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advances in PET imaging of cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan A DisselhorstWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-1866
Marcel A KruegerWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
S M Minhaz Ud-DeanWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Ilja BezrukovWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Mohamed A JarbouiWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Christoph TrautweinWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Andreas TraubeProject Group for Automation in Medicine and Biotechnology, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Christian SpindlerProject Group for Automation in Medicine and Biotechnology, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Jonathan M CottonWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Dieter LeibfritzWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Bernd J PichlerWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Bernd.Pichler@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

European Research Council 323196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic heterogeneity is commonly observed in diseased tissue, specifically in tumors. Multimodal imaging technologies can reveal tissue heterogeneity noninvasively in vivo, enabling imaging-based profiling of receptors, metabolism, morphology, or function on a macroscopic scale. In contrast, in vitro multiomics, immunohistochemistry, or histology techniques accurately characterize these heterogeneities in the cellular and subcellular scales in a more comprehensive but ex vivo manner. The complementary in vivo and ex vivo information would provide an enormous potential to better characterize a disease. However, this requires spatially accurate coregistration of these data by image-driven sampling as well as fast sample-preparation methods. Here, a unique image-guided milling machine and workflow for precise extraction of tissue samples from small laboratory animals or excised organs has been developed and evaluated. The samples can be delineated on tomographic images as volumes of interest and can be extracted with a spatial accuracy better than 0.25 mm. The samples remain cooled throughout the procedure to ensure metabolic stability, a precondition for accurate in vitro analysis.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityGenomicsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidney TubulesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMetabolomicsMyocardiumPositron-Emission TomographyProteomicsRNATissue ExtractsTomography, X-Ray ComputedRNATissue Extractsimagingomicstissue extraction

Identifiers

PMID29507209
PMCPMC5879681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.