ArticleBMJ quality & safety2019
Impact of a national QI programme on reducing electronic health record notifications to clinicians.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electronic Health Record Time Allocation Among Primary Care Clinicians at the Veterans Health Administration Using Virtual Observations.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Big data research is everyone's research-Making epilepsy data science accessible to the global community: Report of the ILAE big data commission.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2024Review
- Determinants of appropriate antibiotic and NSAID prescribing in unscheduled outpatient settings in the veterans health administration.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Developing Patient-Centered Communication Ecosystems in Integrated Health Care Delivery Organizations.The Permanente journal · 2023Article
- Leveraging quality improvement to promote health equity: standardization of prenatal aspirin recommendations.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Refining Clinical Phenotypes to Improve Clinical Decision Support and Reduce Alert Fatigue: A Feasibility Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Dealing with information overload: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- A scoping review of local quality improvement using data from UK perioperative National Clinical Audits.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2022Article
- The effect of My Health Record use in the emergency department on clinician-assessed patient care: results from a survey.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Contribution of Free-Text Comments to the Burden of Documentation: Assessment and Analysis of Vital Sign Comments in Flowsheets.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Variation in electronic test results management and its implications for patient safety: A multisite investigation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Electronic Health Record Optimization and Clinician Well-Being: A Potential Roadmap Toward Action.NAM perspectives · 2020Review
- Scope of Burnout Among Young Gastroenterologists and Practical Solutions from Gastroenterology and Other Disciplines.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Review
- A Quality Initiative Reducing Adverse Outcomes in Pediatric Patients with DKA During Intrafacility Transit.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmerging evidence suggests electronic health record (EHR)-related information overload is a risk to patient safety. In the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), EHR-based 'inbox' notifications originally intended for communicating important clinical information are now cited by 70% of primary care practitioners (PCPs) to be of unmanageable volume. We evaluated the impact of a national, multicomponent, quality improvement (QI) programme to reduce low-value EHR notifications.
methodsThe programme involved three steps: (1) accessing daily PCP notification load data at all 148 facilities operated nationally by the VA; (2) standardising and restricting mandatory notification types at all facilities to a recommended list; and (3) hands-on training for all PCPs on customising and processing notifications more effectively. Designated leaders at each of VA's 18 regional networks led programme implementation using a nationally developed toolkit. Each network supervised technical requirements and data collection, ensuring consistency. Coaching calls and emails allowed the national team to address implementation challenges and monitor effects. We analysed notification load and mandatory notifications preintervention (March 2017) and immediately postintervention (June-July 2017) to assess programme impact.
resultsMedian number of mandatory notification types at each facility decreased significantly from 15 (IQR: 13-19) to 10 (IQR: 10-11) preintervention to postintervention, respectively (P<0.001). Mean daily notifications per PCP decreased significantly from 128 (SEM=4) to 116 (SEM=4; P<0.001). Heterogeneity in implementation across sites led to differences in observed programme impact, including potentially beneficial carryover effects.
conclusionsBased on prior estimates on time to process notifications, a national QI programme potentially saved 1.5 hours per week per PCP to enable higher value work. The number of daily notifications remained high, suggesting the need for additional multifaceted interventions and protected clinical time to help manage them. Nevertheless, our project suggests feasibility of using large-scale 'de-implementation' interventions to reduce unintended safety or efficiency consequences of well-intended electronic communication systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.