Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507096›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2018

Not just heads and tails: The complexity of the sperm epigenome.

Hannah B Gold, Yoon Hee Jung, Victor G Corces

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the state of chromatin in mammalian sperm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetic Reprogramming in Early Animal Development.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Epigenetics of pregnancy: looking beyond the DNA code.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion.Translational andrology and urology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah B GoldFrom the Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.
Yoon Hee JungFrom the Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.
Victor G CorcesFrom the Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322 vgcorces@gmail.com.

Funding

Mechanisms of transgenerational epigenetic inheritanceR01ES027859 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Victor G. Corces · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transgenerational inheritance requires mechanisms by which epigenetic information is transferred via gametes. Canonical thought holds that mammalian sperm chromatin would be incapable of carrying epigenetic information as post-translational modifications of histones because of their replacement with protamine proteins. Furthermore, compaction of the sperm genome would hinder DNA accessibility of proteins involved in transcriptional regulation and genome architecture. In this Minireview, we delineate the paternal chromatin remodeling events during spermatogenesis and fertilization. Sperm chromatin is epigenetically modified at various time points throughout its development. This allows for the addition of environment-specific modifications that can be passed from parents to offspring.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyFertilizationHumansMalePaternal InheritanceSpermatogenesisSpermatozoachromatinCTCFepigenetic inheritanceepigeneticshistoneprotaminespermsperm chromatintranscriptiontransgenerational inheritance

Identifiers

PMID29507096
PMCPMC6130957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.