Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29507062›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2018

Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin in Sepsis Patients: Should Alternative Dosing Strategies Be Considered?

Maria Goul Andersen, Anders Thorsted, Merete Storgaard, Anders N Kristoffersson, Lena E Friberg, Kristina Öbrink-Hansen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in extracorporeal renal replacement therapy].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Goul AndersenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark mariagoulandersen@gmail.com.
Anders ThorstedDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Merete StorgaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders N KristofferssonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3166-9981
Lena E FribergDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kristina Öbrink-HansenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sufficient antibiotic dosing in septic patients is essential for reducing mortality. Piperacillin-tazobactam is often used for empirical treatment, but due to the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability seen in septic patients, optimal dosing may be a challenge. We determined the PK profile for piperacillin given at 4 g every 8 h in 22 septic patients admitted to a medical ward. Piperacillin concentrations were compared to the clinical breakpoint MIC for

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPiperacillinProspective StudiesSepsisPiperacillinaugmented renal clearancedosage optimizationpiperacillinpopulation pharmacokineticssepsis

Identifiers

PMID29507062
PMCPMC5923116
OpenAlexW2790454852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.