Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29506580›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Martin S Dennis, Gordon D Murray, Karen Innes, Jonathan Drever, Lynn Dinsmore, Carol Williams, Philip M White, William N Whiteley, Peter A G Sandercock and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antithrombotic treatment after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Antithrombotic Management After Intracranial Hemorrhage.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rustam Al-Shahi SalmanCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK. Rustam.Al-Shahi@ed.ac.uk.
Martin S DennisCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Gordon D MurrayUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Karen InnesCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Jonathan DreverCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Lynn DinsmoreCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Carol WilliamsCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Philip M WhiteInstitute of Neuroscience and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
William N WhiteleyCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Peter A G SandercockCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Cathie L M SudlowCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
David E NewbyCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nikola SpriggFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David J WerringInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
RESTART collaborators
University of Edinburgh · GBNewcastle Hospitals - Campus for Ageing and Vitality · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/18/2/33719British Heart Foundation FS/13/72/30531British Heart Foundation PG/14/50/30891British Heart Foundation SP/12/2/20422British Heart Foundation SP/12/2/29422Chief Scientist Office SCAF/17/01Medical Research Council G1002605Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1The Dunhill Medical Trust R380R/1114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor adults surviving stroke due to spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) who had taken an antithrombotic (i.e. anticoagulant or antiplatelet) drug for the prevention of vaso-occlusive disease before the ICH, it is unclear whether starting antiplatelet drugs results in an increase in the risk of recurrent ICH or a beneficial net reduction of all serious vascular events compared to avoiding antiplatelet drugs. METHODS/

designThe REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) is an investigator-led, randomised, open, assessor-blind, parallel-group, randomised trial comparing starting versus avoiding antiplatelet drugs for adults surviving antithrombotic-associated ICH at 122 hospital sites in the United Kingdom. RESTART uses a central, web-based randomisation system using a minimisation algorithm, with 1:1 treatment allocation to which central research staff are masked. Central follow-up includes annual postal or telephone questionnaires to participants and their general (family) practitioners, with local provision of information about adverse events and outcome events. The primary outcome is recurrent symptomatic ICH. The secondary outcomes are: symptomatic haemorrhagic events; symptomatic vaso-occlusive events; symptomatic stroke of uncertain type; other fatal events; modified Rankin Scale score; adherence to antiplatelet drug(s). The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sub-study involves the conduct of brain MRI according to a standardised imaging protocol before randomisation to investigate heterogeneity of treatment effect according to the presence of brain microbleeds. Recruitment began on 22 May 2013. The target sample size is at least 720 participants in the main trial (at least 550 in the MRI sub-study). DISCUSSION: Final results of RESTART will be analysed and disseminated in 2019.

trial registrationISRCTN71907627 ( www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN71907627 ). Prospectively registered on 25 April 2013.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageDisability EvaluationDrug Administration ScheduleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMulticenter Studies as TopicPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsStrokeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomFibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAntiplatelet therapyIntracerebral haemorrhageRandomised controlled trialSecondary preventionStroke

Identifiers

PMID29506580
PMCPMC5838871
OpenAlexW2791775292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.