Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29506568›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

Digital storytelling as a method in health research: a systematic review protocol.

Kendra L Rieger, Christina H West, Amanda Kenny, Rishma Chooniedass, Lisa Demczuk, Kim M Mitchell, Joanne Chateau, Shannon D Scott

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05522166 (The Effect of Digital Stories and Face-to-face Applied Basic Life Support Trainings on Knowledge and Skill Levels of Pre-service Teachers), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05522166 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Digital Stories and Face-to-face Applied Basic Life Support Trainings on Knowledge and Skill Levels of Pre-service Teachers

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaradeniz Technical UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled76ConditionsCardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Basic Life SupportArmsDigital Stories and Face-to-face Basic Life Support Trainings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Animated videos for childhood cancer precision medicine: development and evaluation with parents and patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. JDR clinical and translational research · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kendra L RiegerCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 317 Helen Glass Ctr, 89 Curry Pl, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada. Kendra.Rieger@umanitoba.ca.
Christina H WestCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 317 Helen Glass Ctr, 89 Curry Pl, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.
Amanda KennyLa Trobe Rural Health School, LaTrobe University, Bendigo, Australia.
Rishma ChooniedassMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Lisa DemczukElizabeth Dafoe Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kim M MitchellCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 317 Helen Glass Ctr, 89 Curry Pl, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.
Joanne ChateauCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 317 Helen Glass Ctr, 89 Curry Pl, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.
Shannon D ScottFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital storytelling is an arts-based research method with potential to elucidate complex narratives in a compelling manner, increase participant engagement, and enhance the meaning of research findings. This method involves the creation of a 3- to 5-min video that integrates multimedia materials including photos, participant voices, drawings, and music. Given the significant potential of digital storytelling to meaningfully capture and share participants' lived experiences, a systematic review of its use in healthcare research is crucial to develop an in-depth understanding of how researchers have used this method, with an aim to refine and further inform future iterations of its use.

methodsWe aim to identify and synthesize evidence on the use, impact, and ethical considerations of using digital storytelling in health research. The review questions are as follows: (1) What is known about the purpose, definition, use (processes), and contexts of digital storytelling as part of the research process in health research? (2) What impact does digital storytelling have upon the research process, knowledge development, and healthcare practice? (3) What are the key ethical considerations when using digital storytelling within qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research studies? Key databases and the grey literature will be searched from 1990 to the present for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies that utilized digital storytelling as part of the research process. Two independent reviewers will screen and critically appraise relevant articles with established quality appraisal tools. We will extract narrative data from all studies with a standardized data extraction form and conduct a thematic analysis of the data. To facilitate innovative dissemination through social media, we will develop a visual infographic and three digital stories to illustrate the review findings, as well as methodological and ethical implications. DISCUSSION: In collaboration with national and international experts in digital storytelling, we will synthesize key evidence about digital storytelling that is critical to the development of methodological and ethical expertise about arts-based research methods. We will also develop recommendations for incorporating digital storytelling in a meaningful and ethical manner into the research process. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registry number CRD42017068002 .

Indexed as

ArtCommunicationHealth Services ResearchNarrationHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicArtsArts-basedDigital storytellingEthical considerationsHealth researchStoriesSystematic reviewVisual research methods

Identifiers

PMID29506568
PMCPMC5838876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.