Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29506533›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

A software tool 'CroCo' detects pervasive cross-species contamination in next generation sequencing data.

Paul Simion, Khalid Belkhir, Clémentine François, Julien Veyssier, Jochen C Rink, Michaël Manuel, Hervé Philippe, Maximilian J Telford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul SimionInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution (ISEM), UMR 5554, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Khalid BelkhirInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution (ISEM), UMR 5554, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Clémentine FrançoisInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution (ISEM), UMR 5554, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Julien VeyssierInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution (ISEM), UMR 5554, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jochen C RinkMax Plank Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Michaël ManuelSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), Evolution Paris-Seine (UMR7138), Case 05, 7 Quai St Bernard, 75005, Paris, France.
Hervé PhilippeCentre de Théorisation et de Modélisation de la Biodiversité, Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR CNRS 5321, Moulis, 09200, France.
Maximilian J TelfordCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics Evolution and Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. m.telford@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H006966/1European Research Council 322790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple RNA samples are frequently processed together and often mixed before multiplex sequencing in the same sequencing run. While different samples can be separated post sequencing using sample barcodes, the possibility of cross contamination between biological samples from different species that have been processed or sequenced in parallel has the potential to be extremely deleterious for downstream analyses.

resultsWe present CroCo, a software package for identifying and removing such cross contaminants from assembled transcriptomes. Using multiple, recently published sequence datasets, we show that cross contamination is consistently present at varying levels in real data. Using real and simulated data, we demonstrate that CroCo detects contaminants efficiently and correctly. Using a real example from a molecular phylogenetic dataset, we show that contaminants, if not eliminated, can have a decisive, deleterious impact on downstream comparative analyses.

conclusionsCross contamination is pervasive in new and published datasets and, if undetected, can have serious deleterious effects on downstream analyses. CroCo is a database-independent, multi-platform tool, designed for ease of use, that efficiently and accurately detects and removes cross contamination in assembled transcriptomes to avoid these problems. We suggest that the use of CroCo should become a standard cleaning step when processing multiple samples for transcriptome sequencing.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHydrozoaRNA, MessengerSoftwareSpecies SpecificityRNA, MessengerContaminationCtenophoraNGSPhylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID29506533
PMCPMC5838952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.