Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29506530›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2018

The effects of gait training using powered lower limb exoskeleton robot on individuals with complete spinal cord injury.

Cheng-Hua Wu, Hui-Fen Mao, Jwu-Sheng Hu, Ting-Yun Wang, Yi-Jeng Tsai, Wei-Li Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Hua WuInstitute of Electrical Control Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Hui-Fen MaoSchool of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jwu-Sheng HuInstitute of Electrical Control Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Ting-Yun WangFREE Bionics, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yi-Jeng TsaiFREE Bionics, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Wei-Li HsuSchool and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. wlhsu@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-4577-140X
National Taiwan University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWSomnics (Taiwan) · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPowered exoskeleton can improve the mobility for people with movement deficits by providing mechanical support and facilitate the gait training. This pilot study evaluated the effect of gait training using a newly developed powered lower limb exoskeleton robot for individuals with complete spinal cord injury (SCI).

methodsTwo participants with a complete SCI were recruited for this clinical study. The powered exoskeleton gait training was 8 weeks, 1 h per session, and 2 sessions per week. The evaluation was performed before and after the training for (1) the time taken by the user to don and doff the powered exoskeleton independently, (2) the level of exertion perceived by participants while using the powered exoskeleton, and (3) the mobility performance included the timed up-and-go test, 10-m walk test, and 6-min walk test with the powered exoskeleton. The safety of the powered exoskeleton was evaluated on the basis of injury reports and the incidence of falls or imbalance while using the device.

resultsThe results indicated that the participants were donning and doffing the powered lower limb exoskeleton robot independently with a lower level of exertion and walked faster and farther without any injury or fall incidence when using the powered exoskeleton than when using a knee-ankle-foot orthosis. Bone mineral densities was also increased after the gait training. No adverse effects, such as skin abrasions, or discomfort were reported while using the powered exoskeleton.

conclusionsThe findings demonstrated that individuals with complete SCI used the powered lower limb exoskeleton robot independently without any assistance after 8 weeks of powered exoskeleton gait training.

trial registrationTrial registration: National Taiwan University Hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 201210051RIB . Name of registry: Hui-Fen Mao. URL of registry: Not available. Date of registration: December 12th, 2012. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: January 3rd, 2013.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultExercise TherapyHumansMalePilot ProjectsAssistive deviceComplete spinal injuryExoskeleton robotGaitTraining

Identifiers

PMID29506530
PMCPMC5838988
OpenAlexW2799981557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.