Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29506500›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Community-based maternal, newborn, and child health surveillance: perceptions and attitudes of local stakeholders towards using mobile phone by village health volunteers in the Kenge Health Zone, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Mulamba Diese, Albert Kalonji, Bibiche Izale, Susie Villeneuve, Ngoma Miezi Kintaudi, Guy Clarysse, Ngashi Ngongo, Abel Mukengeshayi Ntambue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impacts of Technology Use on the Workload of Registered Nurses: A Scoping Review.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mulamba DieseCenter for Applied Research and Development, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. mdiese@crad-rdc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-9823
Albert KalonjiSanté Rurale (SANRU), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Bibiche IzaleSanté Rurale (SANRU), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Susie VilleneuveUNICEF Democratic Republic of Congo, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Ngoma Miezi KintaudiSanté Rurale (SANRU), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Guy ClarysseUNICEF Democratic Republic of Congo, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Ngashi NgongoUNICEF New York, New York, USA.
Abel Mukengeshayi NtambueCenter for Applied Research and Development, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
United Nations Children's Fund · USUniversity of Kinshasa · CDUniversity of Lubumbashi · CD

Funding

Implementation Research Platform (IRP) Secretariat World Health Organization HQHSR1610603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn early 2016, we implemented a community-based maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) surveillance using mobile phones to collect, analyze, and use data by village health volunteers (VHV) in Kenge Health Zone (KHZ), in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The objective of this study was to determine the perceptions of households, attitudes of community health volunteers, and opinions of nurses in Health center and administrative authorities towards the use of mobile phones for MNCH surveillance in the rural KHZ in the DRC.

methodsWe used mixed methods combining phenomenological and descriptive cross-sectional study. Between 3 and 24 March 2016, we collected the data through focus group discussions (FGD) with households, and structured interviews with VHV, local health and administrative authority, and nurses to explore the perceptions on MNCH surveillance using mobile phone. Data from the FGD and interviews  were analyzed using thematic analysis techniques and descriptive statistics respectively.

resultsHealth issues and services for under-five children were well known by community; however, beliefs and cultural norms contributed to the practices of seeking behavior for households. Mobile phones were perceived as devices that render quick services for people who needed help; and the community's attitudes towards the mobile phone use for collection of data, analysis, and use activities were good. Although some of community members did not see a direct linkage between this surveillance approach and health benefits, majority believed that there would be better MNCH services with the use of mobile phone. In addition, VHV will benefit from free healthcare for households and some material benefits and training. The best time to undertake these activities were in the afternoon with mother of the child, being the best respondent at the household.

conclusionHealth issues and services for under-five children are well known and MNCH surveillance using mobile phone by VHV in which the mother can be involved as respondent is accepted.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthAdultCell PhoneChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersCongoCross-Sectional StudiesDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal-Child Health ServicesCommunity, perceptions, attitudesMaternal, newborn, and child health surveillanceMobile technology

Identifiers

PMID29506500
PMCPMC5838964
OpenAlexW2801029612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.