Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29506044›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Echinocandin resistance among Candida isolates at an academic medical centre 2005-15: analysis of trends and outcomes.

Todd P McCarty, Shawn R Lockhart, Stephen A Moser, Jennifer Whiddon, Joanna Zurko, Cau D Pham, Peter G Pappas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis.Clinical epidemiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Molecular investigations onRSC advances · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A SERS Platform for Rapid Detection of Drug Resistance of Non-International journal of nanomedicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Candidiasis byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Pan-Echinocandin-ResistantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Direct Blood Culturing ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Todd P McCartyDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Shawn R LockhartCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephen A MoserDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jennifer WhiddonDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Joanna ZurkoDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Cau D PhamCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Peter G PappasDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the frequency of micafungin resistance among clinically significant isolates of Candida stored at our institution from 2005 to 2015. Chart review of patients with resistant isolates then informed the clinical setting and outcomes associated with these infections. Methods: Clinical Candida isolates had been stored at -80°C in Brucella broth with 20% glycerol from 2005. Isolates were tested using broth microdilution to determine micafungin MICs. All Candida glabrata isolates and all isolates demonstrating decreased susceptibility to micafungin were screened for FKS mutations using a Luminex assay. Results: In total, 3876 Candida isolates were tested for micafungin resistance, including 832 C. glabrata isolates. Of those, 33 isolates from 31 patients were found to have either decreased susceptibility to micafungin and/or an FKS mutation. C. glabrata accounted for the majority of these isolates. While bloodstream infections were found to have a very high mortality rate, isolates from other sites were uncommonly associated with 30-day mortality. Overall resistance rates were very low. Conclusions: Echinocandin resistance in C. glabrata has been increasingly reported but rates at our institution remain very low. We hypothesize that a focus on antifungal stewardship may have led to these observations. Knowledge of local resistance patterns is key to appropriate empirical treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandida glabrataCandidemiaCandidiasisCaspofunginDrug Resistance, FungalEchinocandinsFemaleFungal ProteinsHumansMaleMicafunginMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsMicafungin

Identifiers

PMID29506044
PMCPMC11963700
OpenAlexW2789609115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.