ArticleMedicine2018
A case report with shock induced by tolvaptan in an elderly patient with congestive heart failure.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleTolvaptan (TLV) is a new vasopressin type 2 receptor antagonist effective in patients with heart failure (HF). Accumulating evidences have revealed that treatment with TLV does not alter the blood pressure significantly. PATIENT CONCERNS: An 84-year-old man was diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic HF due to ischemic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, mitral and aortic regurgitation. Treatment with TLV increased the urine volume and improved the dyspnea. After 4 days use of TLV (3.75 mg QD, 7.5 mg QD, 7.5 mg QD, and 15 mg QD, respectively), decrease in blood pressure to less than 90/60 mmHg was observed continuously and the lowest blood pressure was 80/37 mmHg. He was apyretic and felt only thirsty. Central venous pressure was 12 cmH2O. DIAGNOSES: Because no other medications were changed and no signs of hypovolemic, septic, allergic, or cardiac shock were detected, we suspected an adverse reaction to TLV.
interventionIntravenous hydration was performed with 250 mL of normal saline. OUTCOMES: His blood pressure increased gradually and the statue of hypotention lasted for 14 hours. The dose of TLV was decreased to 7.5 mg/d from the next day to discharge. During this period, his blood pressure was stable at about 125/60 mmHg. LESSONS: TLV has side effect of severe hypotension that is consistent with its physiological activity. The dose should be increased gradually to achieve the desired effect, while attention should be paid to potential drug interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.