Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29504895›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

FunGeneNet: a web tool to estimate enrichment of functional interactions in experimental gene sets.

Evgeny S Tiys, Timofey V Ivanisenko, Pavel S Demenkov, Vladimir A Ivanisenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evgeny S TiysThe Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Lavrentyeva 10, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia. tiys@bionet.nsc.ru.
Timofey V IvanisenkoThe Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Lavrentyeva 10, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Pavel S DemenkovThe Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Lavrentyeva 10, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vladimir A IvanisenkoThe Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Lavrentyeva 10, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimation of functional connectivity in gene sets derived from genome-wide or other biological experiments is one of the essential tasks of bioinformatics. A promising approach for solving this problem is to compare gene networks built using experimental gene sets with random networks. One of the resources that make such an analysis possible is CrossTalkZ, which uses the FunCoup database. However, existing methods, including CrossTalkZ, do not take into account individual types of interactions, such as protein/protein interactions, expression regulation, transport regulation, catalytic reactions, etc., but rather work with generalized types characterizing the existence of any connection between network members.

resultsWe developed the online tool FunGeneNet, which utilizes the ANDSystem and STRING to reconstruct gene networks using experimental gene sets and to estimate their difference from random networks. To compare the reconstructed networks with random ones, the node permutation algorithm implemented in CrossTalkZ was taken as a basis. To study the FunGeneNet applicability, the functional connectivity analysis of networks constructed for gene sets involved in the Gene Ontology biological processes was conducted. We showed that the method sensitivity exceeds 0.8 at a specificity of 0.95. We found that the significance level of the difference between gene networks of biological processes and random networks is determined by the type of connections considered between objects. At the same time, the highest reliability is achieved for the generalized form of connections that takes into account all the individual types of connections. By taking examples of the thyroid cancer networks and the apoptosis network, it is demonstrated that key participants in these processes are involved in the interactions of those types by which these networks differ from random ones.

conclusionsFunGeneNet is a web tool aimed at proving the functionality of networks in a wide range of sizes of experimental gene sets, both for different global networks and for different types of interactions. Using examples of thyroid cancer and apoptosis networks, we have shown that the links over-represented in the analyzed network in comparison with the random ones make possible a biological interpretation of the original gene/protein sets. The FunGeneNet web tool for assessment of the functional enrichment of networks is available at http://www-bionet.sscc.ru/fungenenet/ .

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksInternetApoptosisDatabases, GeneticGene OntologyGenomicsHumansThyroid NeoplasmsGene networksGene set analysisModular organizationNode permutationRandom networks

Identifiers

PMID29504895
PMCPMC5836822
OpenAlexW2789069749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.