Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29504424›Full record

ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2018

What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?

Agnes Black, Kimberly Strain, Christine Wallsworth, Sara-Grey Charlton, Wilma Chang, Kate McNamee, Clayon Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Embedding Consumer-Led Research in a Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How Is Equity-Based Co-Creation Enacted in Health and Social Services? An Evaluation of Four Case Studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  10. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Facilitating consumer partnerships in health research.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agnes Black1 Director, Research and Knowledge Translation, Professional Practice Office, Providence Health Care, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9144-9564
Kimberly Strain2 Patient Research Partner, Providence Health Care, Canada.
Christine Wallsworth2 Patient Research Partner, Providence Health Care, Canada.
Sara-Grey Charlton3 Practice Consultant, Professional Practice Office, Providence Health Care, Canada.
Wilma Chang4 Research Assistant, Professional Practice Office, Providence Health Care, Canada.
Kate McNamee3 Practice Consultant, Professional Practice Office, Providence Health Care, Canada.
Clayon Hamilton5 Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective There is growing emphasis on health care organizations to ensure that lay people are meaningfully engaged as partners on research teams. Our aim was to explore the perspectives of patients, family members and informal caregivers who have been involved on health care research teams in Canada and elicit their recommendations for meaningful engagement. Methods We conducted a qualitative study guided by thematic analysis of transcripts of focus groups and interviews of 19 experienced patient research partners in Canada. Results We identified four main themes: research environment, expectations, support and value, which highlight participants' combined perspectives on important factors to ensure their engagement in research is meaningful. Conclusions Our findings add to the evolving evidence base on the perspectives of lay people involved in health care research and their recommendations for research leaders on meaningful engagement. Our study suggests that research leaders should provide a welcoming research environment, outline appropriate expectations for patient research partners on research teams, support patient research partners' engagement in projects and recognize the value patient research partners bring to health research.

Indexed as

Researcher-Subject RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to HealthCanadaCaregiversFamilyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationResearch DesignResearch Subjectspatient and family engagementpatient engagement in researchpatient experiencepatient-oriented researchqualitative methodsresearch priority setting

Identifiers

PMID29504424
PMCPMC6041763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.