Trial reportPediatric diabetes2018
Advancing diabetes management in adolescents: Comparative effectiveness of mobile self-monitoring blood glucose technology and family-centered goal setting.
Trial report in Pediatric diabetes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parenting interventions for parents of children with type 1 diabetes-a systematic review.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Understanding the effectiveness and design of parent-oriented mobile health interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMC pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2024Pooled it
- Benefits, implementation and sustainability of innovative paediatric models of care for children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review.BMC pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Review of Health Care Professional-Delivered Behavioral Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2025Review
- 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- A quantitative model to ensure capacity sufficient for timely access to care in a remote patient monitoring program.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2023Article
- Protocol for the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention: A multi-site randomized controlled trial for adolescents with type 1 diabetes.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Patient and Parent Well-Being and Satisfaction With Diabetes Care During a Comparative Trial of Mobile Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Technology and Family-Centered Goal Setting.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022Article
- Characterization of youth goal setting in the self-management of type 1 diabetes and associations with HbA1c: The Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change trial.Pediatric diabetes · 2020Article
- Dyadic Psychosocial eHealth Interventions: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- The Quality of Family Relationships, Diabetes Self-Care, and Health Outcomes in Older Adults.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs adolescents gain autonomy, it remains important for parents to be involved with diabetes management to avoid deterioration in glycemic control. Technologies for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) allow for remote monitoring in real-time by parents. This research compared 3 strategies for improving SMBG and diabetes self-care in the short-term. These strategies were: (1) health information technology (HIT)-enhanced blood glucose meter that shared blood glucose data among patients, their parent, and care providers, and allowed for text messaging; (2) family-centered goal setting; and (3) a combination of (1) and (2).
methodsOne hundred twenty-eight participants enrolled; 97 adolescent-parent pairs attended clinic at 3-month intervals during the 6-month intervention. Differences between treatment groups were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVAs) for continuous variables and χ
resultsParticipants in the HIT-enhanced SMBG group had no change in mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Participants assigned to family-centered goal setting had a non-significant decrease in HbA1c of -0.3% (P = .26) from baseline to 6 months. Participants in the combined approach had a significant decrease in HbA1c of -0.6% (P = .02) from baseline to 3 months, but the decrease of -0.4% at 6 months was non-significant (P = .51). The change in HbA1c from baseline to 3 months was greater for the combined approach than for the HIT-enhanced SMBG (P = .05) or family-centered goal setting (P = .01).
conclusionsOur data suggest that utilizing the family-centered goal setting strategy when implementing HIT-enhanced diabetes technology deserves further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.