Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29503850›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2017

Sulfur - fluorine bond in PET radiochemistry.

Giancarlo Pascali, Lidia Matesic, Bo Zhang, Andrew T King, Andrea J Robinson, Alison T Ung, Benjamin H Fraser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances of S-ACS omega · 2023
    Review
  2. Recent Advances inPharmaceutics · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Sulfur [Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Reaction of [Frontiers in chemistry · 2021
    Review
  7. Chemistry for Positron Emission Tomography: Recent Advances inAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giancarlo Pascali1Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7919-8416
Lidia Matesic1Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New South Wales, Australia.
Bo Zhang1Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew T King1Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrea J Robinson3School of Chemistry, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Alison T Ung4School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Benjamin H Fraser1Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of the sulfur-fluorine bond is starting to increase in modern medicinal chemistry literature. This is due to a better understanding of the stability and reactivity of this moiety depending on the various oxidation states of sulfur. Furthermore, several commercial reagents used for mild and selective fluorination of organic molecules are based on the known reactivity of S-F groups. In this review, we will show how these examples are translating into the

Indexed as

18FDeoxyfluorinationFluoride relayFluorosulfatePETSulfonyl fluorideSulfur-fluorine bondSulfurhexafluoride

Identifiers

PMID29503850
PMCPMC5824700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.