ArticleFrontiers in oncology2018
Microstructure Characterization of Bone Metastases from Prostate Cancer with Diffusion MRI: Preliminary Findings.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Emerging methods for prostate cancer imaging: evaluating cancer structure and metabolic alterations more clearly.Molecular oncology · 2021Review
- Non-invasive assessment of glioma microstructure using VERDICT MRI: correlation with histology.European radiology · 2019Article
- Towards a 'resolution limit' for DW-MRI tumor microstructural models: A simulation study investigating the feasibility of distinguishing between microstructural changes.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- How rapid advances in imaging are defining the future of precision radiation oncology.British journal of cancer · 2019Review
- How clinical imaging can assess cancer biology.Insights into imaging · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine the usefulness of rich diffusion protocols with high
methodsFour patients were scanned using 13
resultsADC and IVIM did not fit the data well, failing to capture the signal at high
conclusionBoth Kurtosis and VERDICT explained the diffusion signal better than ADC and IVIM, primarily due to poor fitting at high
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.