Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29503666›Full record

ArticleChild development perspectives2017

Continuity and Stability in Development.

Marc H Bornstein, Diane L Putnick, Gianluca Esposito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development perspectives, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Positioning adolescence in the developmental timeline.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Development of Internalizing Mental Health Symptoms from Early Childhood to Late Adolescence.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marc H BornsteinChild and Family Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and Nanyang Technological University.
Diane L PutnickChild and Family Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and Nanyang Technological University.
Gianluca EspositoChild and Family Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and Nanyang Technological University.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental science is centrally concerned with both consistency and change in characteristics through time. Consistency and change in development are tracked by group mean level continuity and individual order stability. Group mean level and individual order consistency and change are both developmentally informative and can co-exist conceptually and empirically as the two are partially orthogonal perspectives on development. Continuity and stability are broadly applicable to characteristics of the individual, dyad, and environment. Significantly, absent the distinctions we draw between mean level continuity and individual order stability, researchers who use the terms willy-nilly leave their readers in the dark as to which key feature of development is meant. In this article, we distinguish the two types of consistency and change, their measurement, importance, moderation, and implications.

Identifiers

PMID29503666
PMCPMC5830131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.