ArticleGlobal bioethics = Problemi di bioetica2018
Hidden concerns of sharing research data by low/middle-income country scientists.
Article in Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Context of data sharing practices in collaborative human genomic research in low and middle income countries: A systematic review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers impeding research data sharing on chronic disease prevention among the older adults in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Recommendations for robust and reproducible preclinical research in personalised medicine.BMC medicine · 2023Guideline
- Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics.BMC medical ethics · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of researchers' and healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Research Review: A scoping review exploring the needs, barriers, and facilitators to the collection of biological data in adolescence for mental health research.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Review
- Improving FAIRness of Geospatial data using Large Language Models.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Centering Asian voices in global aging research: strengthening data infrastructure in East and Southeast Asia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- The data transparency crisis in research: Lessons from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Renal Clinical Study Participants Support Data Sharing and Use of Artificial Intelligence.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Autism data sharing: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Identifying the motivators, benefits and barriers to sharing participant-level data and samples: results from an international online survey of acute febrile illness cohort teams.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Attitudes and practices of researchers on the sharing of genomic data: a qualitative study in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels Worldwide and in Jordan: Implications for Patient Dose Reduction.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2026Review
- Applying a systems thinking approach to evaluating the effectiveness of Africa's foodborne disease surveillance systems.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Provide proactive reproducible analysis transparency with every publication.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Sustainable open data ecosystems through data quality, governance, and infrastructure: Unlocking social, political and economic value.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Addressing the gap in health data management skills: an online self-guided course for researchers and health professionals.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There has considerable interest in bringing low/middle-income countries (LMIC) scientists into discussions on Open Data - both as contributors and users. The establishment of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.