Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29503558›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2018

The frequency, risk factors, and complications of gastrointestinal dysfunction during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients.

Ayse Gulsah Atasever, Perihan Ergin Ozcan, Kamber Kasali, Taner Abdullah, Gunseli Orhun, Evren Senturk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04014816 (The Frequency, Risk Factors, and Complications of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction During Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04014816 completednot on this map

The Frequency, Risk Factors, and Complications of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction During Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorAyancık State HospitalRan2015 to 2015Enrolled137ConditionsGastrointestinal Disease, Constipation, Intolerance, NutritionalArmsMDR bacteria positivity, negative fluid balance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pelvic Floor Considerations in COVID-19.Journal of women's health physical therapy · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ayse Gulsah AtaseverAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sinop Ayancik State Hospital, Sinop, Turkey.
Perihan Ergin OzcanAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Istanbul University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kamber KasaliBiostatistics, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Taner AbdullahAnesthesiology Department, Istanbul University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gunseli OrhunAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Istanbul University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Evren SenturkAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul Eye Hospital · TRAtatürk University · TRKoç University · TRSinop University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders in intensive care patients remain relatively unexplored. Nowadays, the frequency, risk factors and complications of GI dysfunction during enteral nutrition (EN) become more questionable.

aimTo evaluate the frequency, risk factors and complications of GI dysfunction during EN in the first 2 weeks of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and to identify precautions to prevent the development of GI dysfunction and avoid complications.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, we deliberately targeted at-risk patients. A total of 137 patients who received nasogastric tube feeding in an ICU of a tertiary hospital were enrolled.

resultsThe incidence of GI dysfunction that was found to be 63% which was associated mainly between MDR bacteria positivity and negative fluid balance. Diarrhea was observed in 36 patients (26%) and on 147 patient-days (incidence rate, 5.5 per 100 patient-days). The median day of diarrhea onset was 6 days after the initiation of EN. Forty patients (29%) presented with constipation (85% during the first week). Fifty patients (36%) exhibited upper digestive intolerance on 212 patient-days (incidence rate, 7.9 per 100 patient-days), after a median EN duration of 6 days (range, 2-14 days). Logistic regression analysis revealed MDR bacteria growth in the culture (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.15-2.67;

conclusionGI dysfunction should be considered a clinical predictor of inadequate nutrition and prolonged LOS. In addition, the most dramatic risk for GI dysfunction was observed in patients with MDR bacteria growth in the culture and patients in negative fluid balance. Intensivists provide appropriate nutrition for patients, as well as prompt intervention and the development of treatment strategies in the event of GI dysfunction.

Indexed as

bacterialdrug resistanceenteral nutritiongastrointestinal motilityintensive care unitslength of staymultiplewater–electrolyte balance

Identifiers

PMID29503558
PMCPMC5827748
OpenAlexW2791899773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.