Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29503479›Full record

ArticleReviews of modern physics

Optically polarized

T R Gentile, P J Nacher, B Saam, T G Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews of modern physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Amplification mechanism with interacting atomic gases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Observation of magnetic amplification using dark spins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neutron Polarimetry Using a PolarizedNuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment · 2021
    Article
  11. Floquet maser.Science advances · 2021
    Article
  12. Optimizing magnetically shielded solenoids.The Review of scientific instruments · 2020
    Article
  13. Sensitive neutron transverse polarization analysis using aThe Review of scientific instruments · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T R GentileNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA.
P J NacherLaboratoire Kastler Brossel, ENS-PSL Research University, CNRS, UPMC-Sorbonne Universités, Collège de France, Paris, France.
B SaamDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
T G WalkerDepartment of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the physics and technology of producing large quantities of highly spin-polarized

Identifiers

PMID29503479
PMCPMC5830183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.