ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2018
Hysterectomy by vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience with twelve cases.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Patients with Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Feasibility of vNOTES hysterectomy in patients with enlarged uteri: a single-center experience.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2025Article
- Comparison of conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy in previous pelvic surgery: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Sexual Function After Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Discharge within 24 h, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery- more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecology procedures: a retrospective study.BMC women's health · 2024Observational
- Study on the Efficacy of "Information Platform + Self-Care Model" on the Health Status of Discharged Patients Following Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- The Feasibility of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Gynecology Practice: Single-Surgeon Experience.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo declare our initial experience on hysterectomy cases performed using vaginally-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study was conducted with data from 12 patients in our department who were recommended for hysterectomies for various indications between January 2017 and May 2017. The following data were collected retrospectively: age, body mass index (BMI), parity, previous abdominal or pelvic surgery, total operating time, preoperative hemoglobin (Hb), postoperative Hb, peri-operative complications and Visual Analogue Scale scores for evaluating postoperative pain. All patients were laid in the dorsal lithotomy position under general anesthesia. A cervical circumcision, as well as anterior and posterior colpotomy were performed. A self-constructed glove port was then inserted through the anterior and posterior colpotomy openings into the abdominal cavity. After pneumoperitoneum was achieved, a 10-mm rigid zero-degree telescope, disposable conventional laparoscopic grasping forceps, and a tissue sealer were used as standard equipment. After exploration of the abdominal cavity, all uterine vessels and ligaments were sealed and transected using the tissue sealer. After removing the uterus, the vaginal opening was closed using a Vicryl 1-0 suture.
resultsThe following are the mean values for each variable: patients' age: 55.75±9.8 years (range, 43-72 years), BMI: 29.4±5.4 kg/m2 (range, 21-42 kg/m2), operation duration: 66.8±25.3 min (range, 42-120 min), decrease in Hb: 1.5±1 (0-4) gr/dL, and hospital stay: 2.1±0.3 (2-3) days. There were no vaginal wound infections or dehiscence, and no patients reported pain during postoperative pelvic examinations.
conclusionAlthough these findings are from our initial experience, we can affirm the feasibility of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.