Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29502351›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2018

Dense infraspecific sampling reveals rapid and independent trajectories of plastome degradation in a heterotrophic orchid complex.

Craig F Barrett, Susann Wicke, Chodon Sass

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Orchid genome evolution and trait innovation.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Craig F BarrettDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, 5218 Life Sciences Building, 53 Campus Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26501, USA.
Susann WickeInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Muenster, Huefferstr. 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Chodon SassDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 431 Koshland Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Institute for Biodiversity · DEUniversity of California, Berkeley · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Genome Sequencer FLXS10RR029668 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2010 to 2010
$623k
Illumina Sequencer to Facilitate Functional Genomics at BerkeleyS10RR027303 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027303NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterotrophic plants provide excellent opportunities to study the effects of altered selective regimes on genome evolution. Plastid genome (plastome) studies in heterotrophic plants are often based on one or a few highly divergent species or sequences as representatives of an entire lineage, thus missing important evolutionary-transitory events. Here, we present the first infraspecific analysis of plastome evolution in any heterotrophic plant. By combining genome skimming and targeted sequence capture, we address hypotheses on the degree and rate of plastome degradation in a complex of leafless orchids (Corallorhiza striata) across its geographic range. Plastomes provide strong support for relationships and evidence of reciprocal monophyly between C. involuta and the endangered C. bentleyi. Plastome degradation is extensive, occurring rapidly over a few million years, with evidence of differing rates of genomic change among the two principal clades of the complex. Genome skimming and targeted sequence capture differ widely in coverage depth overall, with depth in targeted sequence capture datasets varying immensely across the plastome as a function of GC content. These findings will help to fill a knowledge gap in models of heterotrophic plastid genome evolution, and have implications for future studies in heterotrophs.

Indexed as

Genome, PlastidHeterotrophic ProcessesBase SequenceGeographyLikelihood FunctionsNorth AmericaOrchidaceaePhylogenyPseudogenesSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsCorallorhizahybrid capturemycoheterotrophparasiteplastid genomepseudogenization

Identifiers

PMID29502351
PMCPMC5902423
OpenAlexW2789812984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.