ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2018
A solid majority remit following evidence-based OCD treatments: a 3-year naturalistic outcome study in pediatric OCD.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcome of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a 7-9-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Three-Year Follow-Up of children and adolescents with OCD Who Did Not Respond to Initial Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT): Outcomes of Continued CBT vs. Sertraline.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Specific Contamination Symptoms are Associated with Experiencing a Limited Response of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Pediatric Patients with OCD.Child psychiatry and human development · 2024Article
- Lessons learned from a multimodal sensor-based eHealth approach for treating pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Long-term effect of stepped-care vs in-person cognitive behavioral therapy for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.Internet interventions · 2023Article
- Early Identification and Intervention in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Neurochemical properties measured byJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Issues in Early-Onset Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and their Treatment Implications.Current neuropharmacology · 2019Review
- Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2019Review
- From Treatment Response to Recovery: A Realistic Goal in OCD.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study reports follow-up 2 and 3 years after the initial assessment of a sample of youth with a primary diagnosis of OCD. Participants were 109 children and adolescents, aged 5-17 years, recruited from a specialized, outpatient OCD clinic in Sweden. Patients were treated with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), augmented when indicated by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). In cases where SSRIs were insufficient, augmentation with a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) was applied. Participants were assessed with the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), Children's OCD Impact Scale (COIS), and Children's Depressive Inventory (CDI) at follow-ups 2 and 3 years after baseline assessment. Treatment response was defined as CY-BOCS total score ≤ 15, and remission was defined as CY-BOCS total score ≤ 10. Analyzing the outcomes with linear mixed-effects models (LME) showed a decrease in OCD symptom load from 23 to 6.9 at the 3-year follow-up. Moreover, two of three (66.1%) participants were in remission, and another 19.2% had responded to treatment at the 3-year follow-up. Thus, 85.3% of participants responded to treatment. Moreover, during the follow-up period, participants' psychosocial functioning had significantly improved, and depressive symptoms had significantly decreased. The results suggest that evidence-based treatment for pediatric OCD, following expert consensus guidelines, has long-term positive effects for most children and adolescents diagnosed with OCD. The results also indicate that improvements are maintained over a 3-year period, at least, and that improvement is also found with regard to psychosocial functioning and depressive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29502315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.